The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconstructing the various facets of dissolved organic carbon bioavailability in freshwater ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
We explored various aspects of freshwater dissolved organic carbon (DOC) lability by comparing short‐term (< 2 d) bacterial C consumption (STCC; derived from bacterial respiration measurements) with long‐term (28 d) C consumption (LTCC) in DOC bioassays in lakes, rivers, and marshes located within the same complex drainage basin in southern Québec. We also combined STCC and LTCC measurements to estimate the proportion of DOC removed, and to derive a first‐order decay constant (k). STCC rates were, on average, 25% higher than LTCC, and both parameters showed distinct patterns, reaching their lowest and highest values in lakes and marshes, respectively. STCC and LTCC were correlated to DOC concentration across these freshwater ecosystems, whereas in lakes, STCC was positively correlated to chlorophyll and LTCC to terrestrial C inputs. k showed no ecosystem‐specific patterns but was negatively correlated to chlorophyll across systems. The size of the DOC pools supporting STCC and LTCC, as well as k, were related to distinct components of the DOC pool, as revealed by a parallel factor analysis of fluorescent dissolved organic matter excitation‐emission spectra. Short‐ and long‐term lability and C consumption, and the resulting k, are shown to be complementary facets of DOC bioavailability, which may play very different roles on aquatic ecosystem functioning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berggren, M., Laudon, H., Haei, M., Ström, L., & Jansson, M. (2010) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.120 · Cited by 217 · cited 4×
“…have suggested that bacteria do consume terrestrially derived DOC in lakes (Tranvik 1988; Kriztberg et al. 2004; McCallister and del Giorgio 2008) and that terrestrial organic carbon significantly subsidizes bacterial metabolism in recipient systems (Jansson et al. 2007; Berggren et al. 2010).”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Controls of dissolved organic matter quality: evidence from a large‐scale boreal lake survey
Kothawala, D. N., Stedmon, C. A., Müller, R. A., Weyhenmeyer, G. A., Köhler, S. J., & Tranvik, L. J. (2014) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12488 · Cited by 396
Lapierre, J.-F., Guillemette, F., Berggren, M., & del Giorgio, P. A. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3972 · Cited by 334
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Guillemette, F., & del Giorgio, P. A.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 734-748
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2153273254
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconstructing the various facets of dissolved organic carbon bioavailability in freshwater ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.2011.56.2.0734
- The paper
- Guillemette, F., & del Giorgio, P. A. (2011). Reconstructing the various facets of dissolved organic carbon bioavailability in freshwater ecosystems. Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2011.56.2.0734
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.