The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A technique for establishing reference nutrient concentrations across watersheds affected by humans
Open accessAbstract
Establishing reference nutrient conditions for rivers and streams is necessary to assess human impact on aquatic ecosystems and protect water quality and biotic integrity. Several methods have been proposed: (1) percentiles from statistical distributions of all rivers and streams in a region or dataset, (2) reference stream approaches, and (3) modeling river networks from existing reference streams. We propose an additional statistical method to estimate the influence of anthropogenic land uses on lotic nutrient concentrations. First, we quantify regional variation by using analysis of covariance, where total nitrogen or total phosphorus is the dependent variable, region is the categorical predictor, and percentage of anthropogenic land use (e.g., cropland, urban land) is the covariate. This allows for the aggregation of regions if there is not a significant regional effect, or if there is a significant regional effect, identifies the need to analyze regions separately. Second, we develop multiple linear regression models with best‐model techniques in which anthropogenic land‐use classifications are the independent variables, and the logarithms of in‐stream nutrient concentrations are the dependent variables. The intercept of these regression models (i.e., expected nutrient concentration in the absence of human activities assuming linear extrapolation to the origin) represents the reference nutrient concentrations. This analysis suggests that larger percentages of cropland and urban land have strong positive influences on in‐stream nutrient concentrations, both in eastern Kansas and across the conterminous United States. The most appropriate method for regions may depend on the relative availability of reference sites and other data sources. The covariance/reference approach offers a potential method for regions with limited numbers of reference sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eutrophication of U.S. Freshwaters: Analysis of Potential Economic Damages
Dodds, W. K., Bouska, W. W., Eitzmann, J. L., Pilger, T. J., Pitts, K. L., Riley, A. J., Schloesser, J. T., & Thornbrugh, D. J. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es801217q · Cited by 1,576
Self-citationLewis, W. M., Wurtsbaugh, W. A., & Paerl, H. W. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es202401p · Cited by 554
Eutrophication and trophic state in rivers and streams
Dodds, W. K. (2006) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0671 · Cited by 451
Self-citationEcological Assessments with Algae: A Review and Synthesis
Stevenson, J. (2014) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1111/jpy.12189 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Dodds, W. K., & Oakes, R. M.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 333-341
- ISSN
- 1541-5856 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122848119
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A technique for establishing reference nutrient concentrations across watersheds affected by humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lom.2004.2.333
- The paper
- Dodds, W. K., & Oakes, R. M. (2004). A technique for establishing reference nutrient concentrations across watersheds affected by humans. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods. https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2004.2.333
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.