The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials
Abstract
Completely revised and updated, the second edition of this classic text retains its predecessor's careful balance of theory and practice while incorporating new approaches, more data sets, and a broader scope. Enhancements in this edition include a new chapter on bioequivalence, methods for analyzing longitudinal continuous and categorical data, ex
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues
Elbourne, D. R., Altman, D. G., Higgins, J. P., Curtin, F., Worthington, H. V., & Vail, A. (2002) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/31.1.140 · Cited by 2,305
(2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16499-4 · Cited by 892
An overview of methods for the analysis of longitudinal data
Zeger, S. L., & Liang, K. (1992) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780111406 · Cited by 678
The Effects of Flow on Airway Pressure During Nasal High-Flow Oxygen Therapy
Parke, R. L., Eccleston, M. L., & McGuinness, S. P. (2011) · Respiratory Care · doi:10.4187/respcare.01106 · Cited by 396
Ferguson, K. A., Ono, T., Lowe, A. A., al-Majed, S., Love, L. L., & Fleetham, J. A. (1997) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.52.4.362 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, B., & Kenward, M. G.
- Venue
- Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks
- Publisher
- Chapman and Hall/CRC
- Published
- 1989-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4300429268
- Cited by
- 639
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.05
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203009277
- The paper
- Jones, B., & Kenward, M. G. (1989). Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials. Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203009277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
