The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Islamic Thought
Abstract
Islamic Thought is a fresh and contemporary introduction to the philosophies and doctrines of Islam. Abdullah Saeed, a distinguished Muslim scholar, traces the development of religious knowledge in Islam, from the pre-modern to the modern period. The book focuses on Muslim thought, as well as the development, production and transmission of religious knowledge, and the trends, schools and movements that have contributed to the production of this knowledge. Key topics in Islamic culture are explored, including the development of the Islamic intellectual tradition, the two foundation texts, the Qur’an and Hadith, legal thought, theological thought, mystical thought, Islamic Art, philosophical thought, political thought, and renewal, reform and rethinking today. Through this rich and varied discussion, Saeed presents a fascinating depiction of how Islam was lived in the past and how its adherents practise it in the present. Islamic Thought is essential reading for students beginning the study of Islam but will also interest anyone seeking to learn more about one of the world’s great religions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Tariq Ramadan, a Swiss-Muslim philosopher and theologian, does not explicitly deny the crucifixion of Jesus in his works.”
From Revisiting the Crucifixion of Jesus within Islam (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“Ramadan emphasises the importance of understanding the event within the context of Islamic theology and tradition and calls for interfaith dialogue and understanding with other religions, including Christianity.”
From Revisiting the Crucifixion of Jesus within Islam (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“Instead, he offers the Islamic perspective on the event and challenges the Christian interpretation.”
From Revisiting the Crucifixion of Jesus within Islam (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Revisiting the Crucifixion of Jesus within Islam
Younes, M. (2024) · Australian Journal of Islamic Studies · doi:10.55831/ajis.v9i1.585
Metadata
- Authors
- Saeed, A.
- Corresponding author
- Saeed, Abdullah
- ORCID
- Saeed, Abdullah
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2006-11-22
- OpenAlex
- W1571571067
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Islamic Thought and Society Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Islamic Studies
- Keywords
- Islamic thought, Islamic intellectual tradition, religious knowledge, Quran, hadith, Islamic legal thought, Islamic theology, Sufism, Islamic art, Islamic philosophy, Islamic political thought, Islamic reform movements, transmission of religious knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
