Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 842

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Direct-Instruction Reading

·2013·Instructional Models in Reading

Abstract

Words are very peculiar creatures (Anderson & Nagy, 1991; Baumann & \nKameenui, 1991; Bryson, 1990). They serve to inspire and enrage, clarify \nand confuse, comfort and cudgel, obscure and occupy; the possibilities are \nendless. Were he to offer his uncanny wisdom to the discussion, Yogi Berra, \nthat legendary wordsmith of baseball slurs, would probably add: "There are \nwords and there are words." Indeed there are.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203052891-7

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 842

Metadata

Venue
Instructional Models in Reading
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2013-04-03
Pages
69-94
OpenAlex
W598821434
Cited by
842
References
0
FWCI
79.35
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct-Instruction Reading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203052891-7
The paper
Direct-Instruction Reading. (2013). Instructional Models in Reading. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203052891-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.