The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education
Abstract
Contents: Preface. Part I: The Nature of Constructivism. K. Tobin, D. Tippins, Constructivism as a Referent for Teaching and Learning. E. von Glasersfeld, Questions and Answers about Radical Constructivism. A. Bettencourt, The Construction of Knowledge: A Radical Constructivist View. W.W. Cobern, Contextual Constructivism: The Impact of Culture on the Learning and Teaching of Science. R.G. Good, J.H. Wandersee, J. St. Julien, Cautionary Notes on the Appeal of the New Ism (Constructivism) in Science Education. Part II: Teaching and Learning of Science and Mathematics. M.C. Linn, N.C. Burbules, Construction of Knowledge and Group Learning. G.H. Wheatley, The Role of Negotiation in Mathematics Learning. E. Jakubowski, Constructing Potential Learning Opportunities in Middle Grades Mathematics. W-M. Roth, Construction Sites: Science Labs and Classrooms. A.J. Gallard, Learning Science in Multicultural Environments. J.J. Gallagher, Secondary Science Teachers and Constructivist Practice. L.P. Rieber, A Pragmatic View of Instructional Technology. Part III: Teacher Learning and Change. K. Tobin, Constructivist Perspectives on Teacher Learning. F.P. Peterman, Staff Development and the Process of Changing: A Teacher's Emerging Constructivist Beliefs about Learning and Teaching. T. Russell, Learning to Teach Science: Constructivism, Reflection, and Learning from Experience. K.L. Shaw, M.L. Etchberger, Transitioning into Constructivism: A Vignette of a Fifth Grade Teacher. P.C.S. Taylor, Collaborating to Reconstruct Teaching: The Influence of Researcher Beliefs. J. Confrey, Learning to See Children's Mathematics: Crucial Challenges in Constructivist Reform. Part IV: Conclusions. T.M. Dana, N.T. Davis, On Considering Constructivism for Improving Mathematics and Science Teaching and Learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690305016 · Cited by 1,293
Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057269608560077 · Cited by 1,049
Challenges with graph interpretation: a review of the literature
Glazer, N. (2011) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2011.605307 · Cited by 285
Designing the Knowledge Integration Environment
Linn, M. C. (2000) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/095006900412275 · Cited by 256
Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system
Tsai, C.-C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S.-M. (2002) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(01)00069-0 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2012-11-12
- OpenAlex
- W1564793226
- Cited by
- 798
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 50.59
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203053409
- The paper
- The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education. (2012). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.