The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Nature of Intellectual Styles
Abstract
This book provides an up-to-date, panoramic picture of the field of intellectual styles through describing, analyzing, and integrating the major theoretical and research works on the topic. Readers will gain a broad understanding of the field--its nature, origins, historical development, theories, research, and applications, as well as the interrelationships among major theoretical constructs proposed by different theorists in the past few decades. In particular, three major controversial issues in the field are addressed by both empirical findings and literature review: styles as better versus worse or as equal in merit; styles as traits versus styles as states; and styles as different constructs versus styles as similar constructs with different style labels.Educators will find ideas on how to improve their teaching and assessment of student performance. Student development specialists will be interested in the book because intellectual styles, as evidenced by recent studies, play a critical role in many aspects of student development including cognitive, affective, psychosocial, and career development. Psychologists will gain an understanding of an important facet of the field at the interface between cognition and personality. Managers in business will find the book relevant to such issues as effective supervision and staff training and development. The Nature of Intellectual Styles is intended for anyone--particularly researchers and students in the fields of education, psychology, and business management--who is interested in understanding intellectual styles and their effects on daily life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Threefold Model of Intellectual Styles
Zhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-005-1635-4 · Cited by 368
Self-citation
Cited by
Franke, T., Attig, C., & Wessel, D. (2019) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1456150 · Cited by 828
Hattie, J., & O’Leary, T. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10002-w · Cited by 107
Moving Beyond Paradoxes: Understanding Chinese Learners and Their Teachers
Rao, N., & Chan, C. K. K. (2010) · Revisiting The Chinese Learner · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3840-1_1 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R. J.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2012-12-06
- OpenAlex
- W2307255830
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.67
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Nature of Intellectual Styles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203053881
- The paper
- Zhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The Nature of Intellectual Styles. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053881
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.