The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know
Abstract
Today, more mediated information is available to more people than at any other time in human history. New and revitalized sense-making strategies multiply in response to the challenges of "cutting through the clutter" of competing narratives and taming the avalanche of information. Data miners, "sentiment analysts," and decision markets offer to help bodies of data "speak for themselves"—making sense of their own patterns so we don’t have to. Neuromarketers and body language experts promise to peer behind people’s words to see what their brains are really thinking and feeling. New forms of information processing promise to displace the need for expertise and even comprehension—at least for those with access to the data. Infoglut explores the connections between these wide-ranging sense-making strategies for an era of information overload and "big data," and the new forms of control they enable. Andrejevic critiques the popular embrace of deconstructive debunkery, calling into question the post-truth, post-narrative, and post-comprehension politics it underwrites, and tracing a way beyond them.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As less human agency is incorporated in their building, these categories lack explainability (Bolin and Andersson Schwarz, 2015); they have been coined”
From How online advertising targets consumers: The uses of categories and algorithmic tools by audience planners (2024) · cites this paper as Andrejevic, 2013
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere
Ging, D. (2019) · Men and Masculinities · doi:10.1177/1097184x17706401 · Cited by 1,245
What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint
Crawford, K., & Gillespie, T. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444814543163 · Cited by 496
The diverse domains of quantified selves: self-tracking modes and dataveillance
Lupton, D. A. (2016) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085147.2016.1143726 · Cited by 462
Quantified sex: a critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps
Lupton, D. A. (2014) · Culture Health & Sexuality · doi:10.1080/13691058.2014.920528 · Cited by 404
Fake News as a Floating Signifier: Hegemony, Antagonism and the Politics of Falsehood
Farkas, J., & Schou, J. (2018) · Javnost - The Public · doi:10.1080/13183222.2018.1463047 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrejevic, M.
- Corresponding author
- Andrejevic, Mark
- ORCID
- Andrejevic, Mark
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-06-26
- OpenAlex
- W4240960057
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 23.16
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Keywords
- information overload, big data, sensemaking, data mining, sentiment analysis, neuromarketing, body language, post-truth, control, datafication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review