The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Foucault and Education
Abstract
First published in 1990, this book was the first to explore Foucault's work in relation to education, arguing that schools, like prisons and asylums, are institutions of moral and social regulation, complex technologies of disciplinary control where power and knowledge are crucial. Original and challenging, the essays assess the relevance of Foucault's work to educational practice, and show how the application of Foucauldian analysis to education enables us to see the politics of educational reform in a new light.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Czerniawski, G. (2023) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3902 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Ball, S. J.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Stephen J. Ball
- ORCID
- Stephen J. Ball
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-05-13
- OpenAlex
- W4254446679
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 26.67
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Philosophy and Social Theory
- Keywords
- Michel Foucault, education, disciplinary power, technologies of power, power and knowledge, educational reform, moral regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review