The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ambiguities of Activism
Abstract
This volume provides a critical and in-depth investigation of the relationship between alter-globalist thinking and practices and their popular discourses. It examines the ways in which several alter-globalist activist groups (like Indymedia, no-borders campaigns, and forms of climate change activism), as well as left-wing intellectuals and academics (like Michael Hardt, Al Gore, Antonio Negri, Hakim Bey, and Geert Lovink), mobilize problematic discourses, tools, and divisions in an attempt to overcome gendered, raced, and classed oppressions worldwide. The book draws out how these mobilizations and theorizations, despite (or possibly because of) their liberatory claims, are actually implicated in the intensification of global hierarchies by repeatedly invoking narratives of transcendence, connection, progress, and in particular of speed. Hoofd argues that the humanist ideals that underlie all these practices paradoxically trigger increasing disenfranchisements worldwide.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Hoofd (2012) explores an analogous situation whereby digital activism -or the employment of digital technology -replicates the valorisation of speed, connectivity, and digital activity of the subject-agent of digital neoliberalism. This may actually have the outcome of accelerating and strengthening the spin of the digital neoliberal globe.”
From In Digital We Trust: Bitcoin Discourse, Digital Currencies, and Decentralized Network Fetishism (2018) · cites this paper as Hoofd (2012)
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Higher Education and the Modern/Colonial Global Imaginary
Stein, S. E., & Andreotti, V. (2016) · Culture Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies · doi:10.1177/1532708616672673 · Cited by 144
‘Beyond 2015’, within the modern/colonial global imaginary? Global development and higher education
Stein, S. E., Andreotti, V., & Suša, R. (2016) · Critical Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1247737 · Cited by 109
Stein, S. E. (2015) · Journal of College and Character · doi:10.1080/2194587x.2015.1091361 · Cited by 104
In Digital We Trust: Bitcoin Discourse, Digital Currencies, and Decentralized Network Fetishism
Baldwin, J. (2018) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-018-0065-0 · Cited by 79
“32 Hoofd (2012) explores an analogous situation whereby digital activism—or the employment of digital technology—replicates the valorisation of speed, connectivity, and digital activity of the subject-agent of digital neoliberalism.”
BackgroundDigital Democracy and Global Citizenship Education: Mutually Compatible or Mutually Complicit?
Andreotti, V., & Pashby, K. (2013) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131725.2013.822043 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoofd, I. M.
- Corresponding author
- Hoofd, Ingrid M.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2012-11-27
- OpenAlex
- W4246726428
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Anarchism and Radical Politics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Economic and Social Issues
- Keywords
- alter-globalization, activism, Indymedia, climate activism, left-wing intellectuals, international hierarchy, speed, transcendence, disenfranchisement, humanism, global justice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review