The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Zonal banning and public order in urban Australia
Abstract
Since 2008, informal flea markets have been spreading throughout poor areas of Paris. Many people, including immigrants, have resorted to selling and buying recuperated goods in order to make a living during tough economic times. As in other cities around the world ( Low 2000 ; Bromley 2000 ; Cross 1998 ), the police have been cracking down on street peddlers, although with mixed results. Such repression, at the behest of inhabitants and local elected officials concerned with security and cleanliness, often puts police officers at odds with the informal order of the street, causing vendors, clients, and passers-by to react to arrests and brutality. Policing thus becomes the catalyzing agent for the formation of publics mobilized for a cause.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“City planning and urban design strategies enact similar influences and pressures upon bodies on a broader scale, through myriad urban features such as footpaths, pedestrian crossings, bus and tram stops that corral and orchestrate individuals and groups through the spaces of a city”
From The London Spikes Controversy: Homelessness, Urban Securitisation and the Question of ‘Hostile Architecture’ (2016) · cites this paper as Palmer and Warren 2013
Citations
Cited by
Petty, J. (2016) · International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy · doi:10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i1.286 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Venue
- Policing Cities
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-07-18
- Pages
- 97-114
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zonal banning and public order in urban Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203107362-16
- The paper
- Zonal banning and public order in urban Australia. (2013). Policing Cities. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203107362-16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.