The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Alone in the Mirror
Abstract
Alone in the Mirror: Twins in Therapy chronicles the triumphs and struggles of twins as they separate from one another and find their individuality in a world of non twins. The text is grounded in issues of attachment and intimacy, and is highlighted by Dr. Barbara Klein’s scholarly research, clinical experiences with twins in therapy, and her own identity struggles as a twin, all of which allow her to present insights into the rare, complicated, and misunderstood twin identity. She presents psychologically-focused real life histories, which demonstrate how childhood experiences shape the twin attachment and individual development, and she describes implications for twins in therapy, their therapists, and parents of twins. Unique to this book are effective therapeutic practices, developed specifically for twins, and designed to raise the consciousness of parents as well. Readers will find these practices and the insights within invaluable, whether they use them to communicate with twin patients, family members, or if they are part of a twinship themselves.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Through counselors' efforts to increase twin clients' self-awareness of their unique twin relationship, therapists can facilitate improvements in identity development (Klein, 2003(Klein, , 2012;;Noble et al., 2017).”
From Seeing Double: A Case Study Examining Systemic Supervision and Therapy Conceptualization of Identical Twins (2026) · cites this paper as Klein, 2012
In the citing paper
“However, these studies fail to detail the conceptualization of these families or how therapy supervisors should navigate this unique family constellation with developing therapists from a systemic therapeutic framework.”
From Seeing Double: A Case Study Examining Systemic Supervision and Therapy Conceptualization of Identical Twins (2026) · cites this paper as Klein, 2012
In the citing paper
“Scholars have emphasized the importance of counselors recognizing the distinctive issues faced by twins (Klein, 2003(Klein, , 2012;;Noble et al., 2017).”
From Seeing Double: A Case Study Examining Systemic Supervision and Therapy Conceptualization of Identical Twins (2026) · cites this paper as Klein, 2012
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lowery, D. F., & Outler, C. (2026) · The Family Journal · doi:10.1177/10664807251384191
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, B.
- Corresponding author
- Klein, Barbara
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2012-05-04
- OpenAlex
- W4232772446
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- twins, twin identity, attachment, intimacy, individuality, childhood experiences, human development, twinship, psychotherapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review