Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reducing Inequalities in Health: A European Perspective

·2003·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

Part One: Introduction Part Two: Key Conceptual Issues 2. Health Impact Assessment 3. Evaluation Issues 4. Universalist Verses Selectivist Approach 5. Gender Perspective Part Three: National Experiences 6. France 7. Italy 8. Lithuania 9. The Netherlands 10. Spain 11. Sweden 12. England/UK 13. Interventions to Reduce Health Inequalities in Barcelona Part Four: Examples of Good/Bad Practice: Lessons to be Learned 14. Income Related Policies How to Cope with Recession 15. Working Conditions 16. Social Security Systems 17. Nutrition Policies 18. Smoking Policies 19. Children 20. Financial Barriers to Health Care Part Five: General Lessons / Policy Implications 22. Reflections on European Experiences 22. Policy Implications Part Five: Extended Summary Glossary

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203167281

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2003-09-02
OpenAlex
W619034431
Cited by
296
References
0
FWCI
19.30
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reducing Inequalities in Health: A European Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203167281
The paper
Reducing Inequalities in Health: A European Perspective. (2003). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203167281

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.