The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On Dialogue
Abstract
Never before has there been a greater need for deeper listening and more open communication to cope with the complex problems facing our organizations, businesses and societies. Renowned scientist David Bohm believed there was a better way for humanity to discover meaning and to achieve harmony. He identified creative dialogue, a sharing of assumptions and understanding, as a means by which the individual, and society as a whole, can learn more about themselves and others, and achieve a renewed sense of purpose.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Resistance to Change: The Rest of the Story
Ford, J. D., Ford, L. W., & D'Amelio, A. (2008) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2008.31193235 · Cited by 1,084
Pedagogies for diversity: retaining critical challenge amidst fears of ‘dumbing down’
Haggis, T. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600922709 · Cited by 360
Pasteur's Quadrant as the Bridge Linking Rigor with Relevance
Smith, G. J., Schmidt, M. M., Edelen-Smith, P. J., & Cook, B. G. (2013) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440291307900202 · Cited by 55
Advancing a Second-Person Contemplative Approach for Collective Wisdom and Leadership Development
Gunnlaugson, O. (2011) · Journal of Transformative Education · doi:10.1177/1541344610397034 · Cited by 24
Human innovation and the creative agency of the world in the age of generative AI
Peschl, M. F. (2024) · Possibility Studies & Society · doi:10.1177/27538699241238049 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Bohm, D.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-04-15
- OpenAlex
- W4248187968
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.96
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Dialogue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203180372
- The paper
- Bohm, D. (2013). On Dialogue. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203180372
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
