The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Written Language Bias in Linguistics
Open accessAbstract
Linguists routinely emphasise the primacy of speech over writing. Yet, most linguists have analysed spoken language, as well as language in general, applying theories and methods that are best suited for written language. Accordingly, there is an extensive 'written language bias' in traditional and present day linguistics and other language sciences. In this book, this point is argued with rich and convincing evidence from virtually all fields of linguistics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221
Cited by
Wray, A., & Grace, G. W. (2007) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.005 · Cited by 411
Text Understanding from Scratch
Zhang, X., & LeCun, Y. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.01710 · Cited by 395
Dialog as interpersonal synergy
Fusaroli, R., Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Tylén, K. (2014) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.005 · Cited by 337
An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory
Arundale, R. B. (2022) · Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) · doi:10.1075/prag.9.1.07aru · Cited by 326
Ecolinguistics: the state of the art and future horizons
Steffensen, S. V., & Fill, A. (2014) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Linell, P.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2004-08-02
- OpenAlex
- W201573966
- Cited by
- 723
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.42
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Written Language Bias in Linguistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203342763
- The paper
- Linell, P. (2004). The Written Language Bias in Linguistics. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203342763
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
