The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interpreting British Governance
Abstract
How is Britain governed? Have we entered a new era of governance? Can traditional approaches to governance help us to interpret 21st century Britain? This book develops the argument that we can understand political practices only by grasping the beliefs on which people act. It offers a governance narrative as a challenge to the Westminster model of British government and searches for a more accurate and open way of speaking about British government.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance?
Stoker, G. (2006) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074005282583 · Cited by 1,351
The rise of ‘new’ policy instruments in comparative perspective: has governance eclipsed government?
Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., & Zito, A. (2005) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00540.x · Cited by 714
Smart cities: Utopia or neoliberal ideology?
Grossi, G., & Pianezzi, D. (2017) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.012 · Cited by 389
Citizens' adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-015-9613-y · Cited by 373
Nilsen, P., Ståhl, C., Roback, K., & Cairney, P. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-63 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W.
- Venue
- Taylor & Francis eBooks
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Published
- 2003
- OpenAlex
- W1547437268
- Cited by
- 756
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.64
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interpreting British Governance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203352311
- The paper
- Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2003). Interpreting British Governance. Taylor & Francis eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203352311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
