The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sustainable Development
Abstract
Argues that environmental problems need to be looked at internationally, in terms of the global economic system, and that the degradation of the environment is not natural', but an historical process which is intrinsically linked and shaped by economic and political systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins
Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5 · Cited by 3,279
Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge
Agrawal, A. (1995) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00560.x · Cited by 2,189
Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure
Jabareen, Y. (2009) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690900800406 · Cited by 1,559
Sustainable development (1987–2005): an oxymoron comes of age
Redclift, M. (2005) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.281 · Cited by 951
Self-citationWho Sustains Whose Development? Sustainable Development and the Reinvention of Nature
Banerjee, S. B. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024001341 · Cited by 785
Metadata
- Authors
- Redclift, M.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2002-11-01
- OpenAlex
- W4213234829
- Cited by
- 500
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.02
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainable Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203408889
- The paper
- Redclift, M. (2002). Sustainable Development. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203408889
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
