The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance
Abstract
Questioning the utopian image of western knowledge as a uniquely successful achievement in its application to economic and social development, this provocative volume, the latest in the EIDOS series, argues that it is unacceptable to dismiss problems encountered by development projects as the inadequate implementation of knowledge. Rather, it suggests that failures stem from the constitution of knowledge and its object. By focussing on the ways in which agency in development is attributed to experts, thereby turning previously active participants into passive subjects or ignorant objects, the contributors claim that the hidden agenda to the aims of educating and improving the lives of those in the undeveloped world falls little short of perpetuating ignorance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 · Cited by 20,632
Outline of a Theory of Practice.
Frank, A. W., & Bourdieu, P. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2066038 · Cited by 14,545
Ryle, G. (2006) · Theories of Mind · doi:10.5040/9798216413257.ch-2 · Cited by 6,809
Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object
Fabian, J. (1983) · Cited by 6,759
Outline of a Theory of Practice
BOURDIEU, P. (2007) · On Violence · doi:10.2307/j.ctv120qr2d.16 · Cited by 5,527
Local Knowledge: Further Essays In Interpretive Anthropology
Geertz, C. (1983) · Cited by 5,044
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature: Thirtieth-Anniversary Edition
RORTY, R. (2008) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvc77b6z · Cited by 4,927
Habermas, J. (1968) · Cited by 4,683
Marxism and the philosophy of language
Voloshinov, V. N. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,967
Cited by
Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge
Agrawal, A. (1995) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00560.x · Cited by 2,189
Shmelev, S. (1998) · Journal of Political Ecology · doi:10.2458/v5i1.21397 · Cited by 885
Gibb, A. A. (2000) · International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1177/0266242600183001 · Cited by 365
Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out?
Wynne, B. (2002) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392102050003010 · Cited by 342
"How We Know": Kwara'ae Rural Villagers Doing Indigenous Epistemology
Gegeo, D. W., & Watson-Gegeo, K. A. (2001) · The Contemporary Pacific · doi:10.1353/cp.2001.0004 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2002-05-03
- OpenAlex
- W2054629179
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 43.05
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203410219
- The paper
- An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance. (2002). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203410219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.