The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk and Blame
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global
Heise, U. K. (2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335637.001.0001 · Cited by 1,409
Accounting, organizing, and economizing: connecting accounting research and organization theory
Miller, P., & Power, M. (2013) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2013.783668 · Cited by 588
Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making
Feindt, P. H., & Oels, A. (2005) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/15239080500339638 · Cited by 394
Governing risky individuals: The role of psychiatry in new regimes of control
Rose, N. (1998) · Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719809524933 · Cited by 345
A Disciplinary Perspective on the Epistemological Status of Risk
Althaus, C. E. (2005) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00625.x · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Douglas, P. M.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2002-05-03
- OpenAlex
- W4236758898
- Cited by
- 828
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 55.19
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk and Blame. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203430866
- The paper
- Douglas, P. M. (2002). Risk and Blame. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203430866
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
