The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education
Open accessAbstract
Papert's (1980) work with Turtle Geometry offered an early and provocative vision of how digital technologies could be used with young learners. Since then, research on digital technology use has focused on the middle and high school levels. Given the increasing diversity of digital technologies, and their varied underlying pedagogical goals and design choices, Clements' (2002) claim that there is no single effect of the computer on mathematics achievement is as true now as it was a decade ago. However, many advances have been made in better articulating the range of design choices that are possible, their potential effect on the cognitive and affective dimensions on mathematics learning, and their varying demands on the teacher. The aim of this chapter is to summarise the research literature on the use of digital technologies in the teaching and learning of mathematics at the k-2 level. In particular, we focus on literature that contributes to our understanding of how the use of digital technologies affects and changes the teaching and learning of mathematics - that is, how different affordances and design choices impact on the way teachers and learners interact and express themselves mathematically. By digital technologies we refer to a range of tools including multi-purpose computer-based software programs, web-based applets, virtual manipulatives, programming languages, CD-ROMs, games, calculators, touchscreen applications and interactive whiteboards. The distinction between these various types is not always evident and, indeed, one goal of this chapter is to provide useful distinguishing features of these various technologies in order to help educators better evaluate and choose amongst them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Raaijmakers, J. G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.2.93 · Cited by 1,696
Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370000802177235 · Cited by 996
(2007) · doi:10.1007/s10758-006-0001-z · Cited by 93
Cited by
Designing for Productive Failure
Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.591717 · Cited by 674
Improving Educational Research:Toward a More Useful, More Influential, and Better-Funded Enterprise
Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x032009003 · Cited by 559
The mathematics teacher’s specialised knowledge (MTSK) model*
Carrillo-Yañez, J., Climent, N., Montes, M., Contreras, L. C., Flores-Medrano, E., Escudero-Ávila, D., Vasco, D., Rojas, N., Flores, P., Aguilar-González, Á., et al. (2018) · Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1080/14794802.2018.1479981 · Cited by 414
The Teacher’s Role in Classroom Discourse: A Review of Recent Research Into Mathematics Classrooms
Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308320292 · Cited by 395
Experimental Evaluation of the Effects of a Research-Based Preschool Mathematics Curriculum
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2008) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831207312908 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2015-07-30
- OpenAlex
- W1962360816
- Cited by
- 1,006
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 134.14
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203448946
- The paper
- Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education. (2015). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203448946
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.