The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical correlates of high hypnotizability
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“it has been consistently shown that the majority of highly suggestible individuals do not suffer from elevated levels of psychiatric symptomatology”
From Hypnosis and top-down regulation of consciousness (2017) · cites this paper as Lynn, Meyer, & Shindler, 2004
In the citing paper
“high hypnotic suggestibility should not be interpreted as inherently pathological (Lynn, Meyer, & Shindler, 2004).”
From Hypnosis and top-down regulation of consciousness (2017) · cites this paper as Lynn, Meyer, & Shindler, 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Baker, E.L. and Nash, M.R. (1987) ‘Applications of hypnosis in the treatment of anorexia nervosa’, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 29:185–93. · doi:10.1080/00029157.1987.10734350
Cited by
Hypnosis and top-down regulation of consciousness
Terhune, D. B., Cleeremans, A., Raz, A., & Lynn, S. J. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.002 · Cited by 196
Self-citation
Metadata
- Venue
- The Highly Hypnotizable Person
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2004-07-15
- Pages
- 195-220
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical correlates of high hypnotizability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203487822-11
- The paper
- Clinical correlates of high hypnotizability. (2004). The Highly Hypnotizable Person. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203487822-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
