Cited by 260Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo MethodsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bayesian Data Analysis

Andrew Gelman, John B. Carlin, Hal S. Stern, Donald B. Rubin·1995·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

Bayesian Data Analysis describes how to conceptualize, perform, and critique statistical analyses from a Bayesian perspective. Using examples largely from the authors' own experiences, the book focuses on modern computational tools and obtains inferences using computer simulations. Its unique features include thorough discussions of the methods for

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203491287

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 260

Metadata

Authors
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B.
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
1995-06-01
OpenAlex
W4256118999
Cited by
258
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 51 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
0.25
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
Bayesian analysis, Bayesian inference, computational tools, computer simulation, statistical modeling, model criticism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review