Getting Started With Facilitation
Abstract
In the previous chapters we have outlined the development and use of the PARIHS framework. We have also outlined our revised PARIHS framework that we are calling the integrated or i-PARIHS framework.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When facilitation is part of another role, the facilitator may feel like a lone agent, and this can result in individual feelings of isolation and being overwhelmed.
“In some cases—and particularly where facilitation is part of another role—the facilitator may feel like a lone agent. However, given the scope and complexity of the role, this is not a desirable situation and can result in individual feelings of isolation and being overwhelmed [62].”
From PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice (2015) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 2 · Cited by 4
- Authors
- Kitson, A., & Harvey, G.
- Venue
- Implementing Evidence-Based Practice In Healthcare
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2015-03-24
- Pages
- 70-84
- OpenAlex
- W2536656726
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- PARIHS framework, i-PARIHS framework, knowledge-practice gap, facilitation, implementation research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
