The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Public Archaeology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This model is especially important, since it acknowledges the importance of agency in public encounters with archaeological data and archaeological sites, as well as the need for an understanding of certain core public values regarding archaeology (Merriman 2004).”
From Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics (2015) · cites this paper as Merriman 2004
In the citing paper
“Much of the European-focused literature on the subject defines public archaeology as an examination of the relationship between archaeology and the public, where the public of public archaeology is represented both by the state, working in the public interest to protect, excavate and investigate society ' s archaeology on their behalf, and by the notional ' general public ' , defined as those who”
From Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics (2015) · cites this paper as Merriman 2004
In the citing paper
“Merriman (2004) offers two models for public archaeology: first, the ' deficit model ' , which is derived from the discipline of science communications and emphasizes the importance of experts encouraging a better public understanding of science, for both its economic value and its benefits for citizenship (Irwin and Wynne 1996; Macdonald 2002). Merriman locates the application of this scientific”
From Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics (2015) · cites this paper as Merriman 2004
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collaborative Archaeologies and Descendant Communities
Colwell, C. (2016) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095937 · Cited by 178
Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics
Richardson, L.-J., & Almansa-Sánchez, J. (2015) · World Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00438243.2015.1017599 · Cited by 140
Evaluating Community Archaeology in the UK
Simpson, F., & Williams, H. (2008) · Public Archaeology · doi:10.1179/175355308x329955 · Cited by 107
The “Color” of Heritage: Decolonizing Collaborative Archaeology in the Caribbean
González-Tennant, E. (2014) · Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage · doi:10.1179/2161944114z.00000000012 · Cited by 26
Westmont, V. C. (2022) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-021-00592-w · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2004-08-02
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
