The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The face of genocide
Abstract
German museums and universities have only slowly become involved in the repatriation debate. A major catalyst has been the Charité Human Remains Project at the Charité university hospital in Berlin that carried out in-depth provenance research and led to the return of the ancestral remains of a Paraguayan individual, the ancestral remains of Aboriginal Australians and a Namibian individual between 2011 and 2014. In particular, the German-Namibian returns were organised against the backdrop of very complex and fraught diplomatic and political relations between Germany and Namibia as well as severe contestations over how to commemorate the colonial genocide (1904–1908) in Namibian internal politics. The chapter investigates how these complexities played out in the design and procedure of the returns, gave voice to various interest groups and concerned communities, and were interpreted on community, regional and national levels. It also argues that the parallel returns of Australian ancestral remains that followed a protocol developed over multiple previous international repatriation events, made an impact on how the two German-Namibian returns evolved. But even if museum professionals and governments strive towards professionalisation and standardisation, repatriation events remains reflective and indicative of the different and, sometimes, conflicting views that actors hold on life and death, on museums and science, on law, ethics, politics, history and colonialism, and that t…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Restitutions from Germany to Namibia in 2011, 2014 and 2018 (see Förster 2020) illustrate a degree of both recognition and redistribution being achieved.”
From Bones and injustices: provenance research, restitutions and identity politics (2023) · cites this paper as Förster 2020
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bones and injustices: provenance research, restitutions and identity politics
Kurzwelly, J. (2023) · Dialectical Anthropology · doi:10.1007/s10624-022-09670-9 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Förster, L.
- Venue
- The Routledge Companion to Indigenous Repatriation
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2020-03-05
- Pages
- 101-127
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review