The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Health, Coping, and Well-being: Perspectives From Social Comparison Theory
Abstract
Over the past decades, the field of health psychology has witnessed a tremendous growth, and social psychologists have contributed substantially to the theoretical foundation of this field. Their research has focused on a wide variety of health-relevant topics such as how individuals decide to respond to threats to their health and well-being, how and why they change their behavior to avoid such threats, and especially, how they adjust to or cope with the risk of threatening disease and with the diseases themselves. As diverse as this literature may be, however, there does appear to be a common theme throughout much of it--the observation that comparison of oneself and one's health status and coping efforts with others is an integral part of the coping process. Consequently, social comparison theory is increasingly becoming recognized as a fruitful framework for illuminating health related issues. A still expanding literature is exploring the role of social comparisons with respect to coping with a wide range of health problems, including cancer, physical decline among the aged, rheumatoid arthritis, AIDS, stress at work and occupational burnout, and eating disorders. Social comparison theory has augmented knowledge about the ways in which people cope with stressful events, and thus has contributed significantly to it. At a more basic level, research in this applied context has made significant contributions to the development of social comparison theory itself. The present volume presents an overview of the various ways in which social comparison theory has been applied to issues related to health, coping, and well-being, and also points out how these applications have contributed to our insight into the way humans employ social comparison information. Given the attention paid to theoretical and applied issues, this volume will appeal to a wide audience, including social and health psychologists, as well as therapists, physicians, clinicians, medical sociologists, nurses, and those involved in the growing field of nursing research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“frequent comparison with others—particularly upward comparison—may intensify feelings of injustice, inadequacy, or frustration during recovery (71, 72).”
From Coping strategies and psychological outcomes following the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: a systematic review with meta-analytic synthesis (2026) · cites this paper as [71]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice.
Schwartz, B. N., Ward, A. C., Monterosso, J. R., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178 · Cited by 1,920
Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854 · Cited by 1,749
Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review
Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12033 · Cited by 1,209
Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field
Buunk, A. P., & Gibbons, F. X. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.007 · Cited by 1,020
CURRENT RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Markovsky, B. (1996) · Cited by 994
Metadata
- Authors
- Buunk, B. P.
- Corresponding author
- Buunk, Bram P.
- Venue
- Psychology Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Psychology Press
- Published
- 2013-05-13
- OpenAlex
- W2121726359
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14
- FWCI
- 15.33
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- social comparison theory, health psychology, coping, well-being, health behavior change, disease risk, cancer, aging, rheumatoid arthritis, AIDS, occupational stress, burnout, eating disorders, social comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review