Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior
Abstract
"Not then, men and their moments. Rather, moment and their men," writes Erving Goffman in the introduction to his groundbreaking 1967 Interaction Ritual, a study of face-to-face interaction in natural settings, that class of events which occurs during co-presence and by virtue of co-presence. The ultimate behavioral materials are the glances, gestures, positionings, and verbal statements that people continuously feed into situations, whether intended or not.A sociology of occasions is here advocated. Social organization is the central theme, but what is organized is the co-mingling of persons and the temporary interactional enterprises that can arise therefrom. A normatively stabilized structure is at issue, a "social gathering," but this is a shifting entity, necessarily evanescent, created by arrivals and killed by departures. The major section of the book is the essay "Where the Action Is," drawing on Goffman's last major ethnographic project observation of Nevada casinos.Tom Burns says of Goffman's work "The eleven books form a singularly compact body of writing. All his published work was devoted to topics and themes which were closely connected, and the methodology, angles of approach and of course style of writing remained characteristically his own throughout. Interaction Ritual in particular is an interesting account of daily social interaction viewed with a new perspective for the logic of our behavior in such ordinary circumstances as entering a crowded elevator or…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Farewells are emotionally sensitive events, signaling transitions and relational closure.
“Research in sociolinguistics and consumer psychology shows that farewells are emotionally sensitive events, signaling transitions and relational closure”
From Emotional Manipulation by AI Companions (2025) · cites this paper as Goffman 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What Makes a Good Conversation?: Challenges in Designing Truly Conversational Agents
Clark, L., Pantidi, N., Cooney, O., Doyle, P., Garaialde, D., Edwards, J., Spillane, B., Gilmartin, E., Murad, C., Munteanu, C., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300705 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Engagement in human-agent interaction: An overview
Oertel, C., Castellano, G., Chetouani, M., Nasir, J., Obaid, M., Pelachaud, C., & Peters, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2020.00092 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Emotional Manipulation by AI Companions
De Freitas, J., Oguz-Uguralp, Z., & Kaan-Uguralp, A. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.19258 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Goffman, E., & Best, J.
- ORCID
- Best, Joel
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-07-12
- OpenAlex
- W4241057687
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 9.39
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- Erving Goffman, interaction rituals, face-to-face interaction, co-presence, social gatherings, everyday social interaction, casino, social organization, sociology of everyday life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review