The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternative Food Networks
Abstract
Farmers’ markets, veggie boxes, local foods, organic products and Fair Trade goods – how have these once novel, "alternative" foods, and the people and networks supporting them, become increasingly familiar features of everyday consumption? Are the visions of "alternative worlds" built on ethics of sustainability, social justice, animal welfare and the aesthetic values of local food cultures and traditional crafts still credible now that these foods crowd supermarket shelves and other "mainstream" shopping outlets? This timely book provides a critical review of the growth of alternative food networks and their struggle to defend their ethical and aesthetic values against the standardizing pressures of the corporate mainstream with its "placeless and nameless" global supply networks. It explores how these alternative movements are "making a difference" and their possible role as fears of global climate change and food insecurity intensify. It assesses the different experiences of these networks in three major arenas of food activism and politics: Britain and Western Europe, the United States, and the global Fair Trade economy. This comparative perspective runs throughout the book to fully explore the progressive erosion of the interface between alternative and mainstream food provisioning. As the era of "cheap food" draws to a close, analysis of the limitations of market-based social change and the future of alternative food economies and localist food politics place this book at the cutting-edge of the field. The book is thoroughly informed by contemporary social theory and interdisciplinary social scientific scholarship, formulates an integrative social practice framework to understand alternative food production-consumption, and offers a unique geographical reach in its case studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245
Renting, H., Marsden, T. K., & Banks, J. (2003) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a3510 · Cited by 1,985
Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda
Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010701419121 · Cited by 1,777
Cited by
Berti, G., & Mulligan, C. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8070616 · Cited by 403
Akinola, R., Pereira, L. M., Mabhaudhi, T., de Bruin, F.-M., & Rusch, L. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12083493 · Cited by 322
The logistics of the short food supply chain: A literature review
Paciarotti, C., & Torregiani, F. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.002 · Cited by 262
Blay-Palmer, A., Santini, G., Dubbeling, M., Renting, H., Taguchi, M., & Giordano, T. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10051680 · Cited by 253
Operationalizing local food: goals, actions, and indicators for alternative food systems
Cleveland, D. A., Carruth, A., & Mazaroli, D. N. (2015) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9556-9 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodman, D., DuPuis, E. M., & Goodman, M. K.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2012-02-20
- OpenAlex
- W2288633321
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 32.54
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternative Food Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203804520
- The paper
- Goodman, D., DuPuis, E. M., & Goodman, M. K. (2012). Alternative Food Networks. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203804520
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.