The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Madness of Women
Abstract
Nominated for the 2012 Distinguished Publication Award of the Association for Women in Psychology! Why are women more likely to be positioned or diagnosed as mad than men? If madness is a social construction, a gendered label, as many feminist critics would argue, how can we understand and explain women's prolonged misery and distress? In turn, can we prevent or treat women’s distress, in a non-pathologising women centred way? The Madness of Women addresses these questions through a rigorous exploration of the myths and realities of women's madness. Drawing on academic and clinical experience, including case studies and in-depth interviews, as well as on the now extensive critical literature in the field of mental health, Jane Ussher presents a critical multifactorial analysis of women's madness that both addresses the notion that madness is a myth, and yet acknowledges the reality and multiple causes of women's distress. Topics include: The genealogy of women’s madness – incarceration of difficult or deviant women Regulation through treatment Deconstrucing depression, PMS and borderline personality disorder Madness as a reasonable response to objectification and sexual violence Women’s narratives of resistance This book will be of great interest to students and scholars of psychology, gender studies, sociology, women's studies, cultural studies, counselling and nursing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is also ample literature attesting to the ways in which structural violence in the form of patriarchal, heteronormative, and transphobic practices have shaped, constrained, and undermined access to timely, appropriate, and supportive mental healthcare for women, gender-diverse people, and 2SLGBTQ+ communities, while normalizing violence and coercion in psychiatric treatment settings [59–62].”
From “Backed into a Corner”: Lived experiences of receiving and providing involuntary psychiatric treatment under British Columbia’s Mental Health Act (2026) · cites this paper as [61]
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Women's experiences of endometriosis: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research
Young, K., Fisher, J., & Kirkman, M. (2014) · Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care · doi:10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100853 · Cited by 241
Young, K., Fisher, J., & Kirkman, M. (2018) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959353518815704 · Cited by 133
Women’s Construction of Embodiment and the Abject Sexual Body After Cancer
Parton, C., Ussher, J. M., & Perz, J. (2015) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732315570130 · Cited by 111
Self-citationThe Madness of Women: Myth and Experience
Ussher, J. M. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7255-2_34 · Cited by 120
Self-citationDiagnosing difficult women and pathologising femininity: Gender bias in psychiatric nosology
Ussher, J. M. (2013) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959353512467968 · Cited by 104
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ussher, J., & Ussher, J. M.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2011-03-28
- OpenAlex
- W4239456052
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Keywords
- female madness, gender and mental illness, social construction of madness, women prisoners, depression, premenstrual syndrome, borderline personality disorder, objectification, sexual violence, woman-centred care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review