The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intentional Conceptual Change
Abstract
Contents: Preface. G.M. Sinatra, P.R. Pintrich, The Role of Intentions in Conceptual Change Learning. Part I: Cognition, Metacognition, and Intentional Conceptual Change. M. Ferrari, N. Elik, Influences on Intentional Conceptual Change. N. deLeeuw, M.T.H. Chi, Self-Explanation: Enriching a Situation Model or Repairing a Domain Model? P. Thagard, R. Zhu, Acupuncture, Incommensurability, and Conceptual Change. M.G. Hennessey, Metacognitive Aspects of Students' Reflective Discourse: Implications for Intentional Conceptual Change Teaching and Learning. M.L. Luque, The Role of Domain-Specific Knowledge in Intentional Conceptual Change. Part II: Epistemological and Social/Motivational Factors in Intentional Conceptual Change. T. Andre, M. Windschitl, Interest, Epistemological Belief, and Intentional Conceptual Change. L. Mason, Personal Epistemologies and Intentional Conceptual Change. A.A. diSessa, A. Elby, D. Hammer, J's Epistemological Stance and Strategies. C. Hynd, Conceptual Change in Response to Persuasive Messages. S.A. Southerland, G.M. Sinatra, Learning About Biological Evolution: A Special Case of Intentional Conceptual Change. E. Linnenbrink, P.R. Pintrich, Achievement Goals and Intentional Conceptual Change. Part III: Prospects and Problems for Models of Intentional Conceptual Change. S. Vosniadou, Exploring the Relationships Between Conceptual Change and Intentional Learning. G. Hatano, K. Inagaki, When Is Conceptual Change Intended? A Cognitive-Sociocultural View. P.R. Pintrich, G.M. Sinatra, Future Directions for Theory and Research on Intentional Conceptual Change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pintrich, P. R. (2003) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667 · Cited by 3,047
Where's the evidence that active learning works?
Michael, J. (2006) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00053.2006 · Cited by 1,648
Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690305016 · Cited by 1,293
On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672 · Cited by 840
Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014) · Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevstper.10.020119 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Sinatra, G. M., & Taasoobshirazi, G.
- Venue
- Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2015-02-17
- OpenAlex
- W1593690745
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.67
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intentional Conceptual Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203839010.ch13
- The paper
- Sinatra, G. M., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2015). Intentional Conceptual Change. Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010.ch13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
