The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
The Cornerstones of Survey Research
Abstract
The goal of this chapter is to introduce the readers to the central issues in survey quality, to discuss the decisions that must be made when designing and implementing a survey, and to review the current methodological and statistical knowledge as presented in the Handbook. Principles important for designing good quality surveys are discussed in terms of the four cornerstones of survey research: coverage, sampling, response, and measurement. These four cornerstones are connected via the specification of the research problem. Specification is concerned with conceptualisation and operationalization, where the research question is translated into survey questions for specific populations and ultimately into observed variables. Coverage and sampling refer to statistical issues that arise because we survey a sample instead of the entire population. Coverage errors occur when the sampling frame does not exactly matches the intended population. Sampling errors occur because we observe only a sample and not the population. If the sample is a probability sample, statistical theory can estimate the amount of sampling error. Response errors, usually designated as nonresponse errors, occur when some of the intended respondents cannot be reached or refuse to respond. If the nonrespondents are not a random sample from all intended respondents, nonresponse can result in biased estimates. Finally, measurement errors refer to discrepancies between the observed measurement and the true value due to the measurement instrument. Measurement errors can originate from many sources, including the interviewer, the respondents, and the specific survey questions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The questionnaire was developed and critically evaluated for face and content validity by a multi-professional team of six professors and lecturers involved in education across physiotherapy and other healthcare fields.
“It was developed and critically evaluated for face and content validity by a multi-professional team of six professors and lecturers involved in education across physiotherapy and other healthcare fields (e.g., nursing, social science, and epidemiology) [63].”
A preliminary version of the questionnaire was pilot tested on a convenience sample of 15 physiotherapy students from different regions of Italy, guaranteeing national representation.
“a preliminary version was piloted tested on a convenience sample of 15 physiotherapy students from different regions of Italy (North, n = 5; Centre, n = 5; South, n = 5), guaranteeing national representation [63].”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tortella, F., Palese, A., Turolla, A., Castellini, G., Pillastrini, P., Landuzzi, M. G., Cook, C., Galeoto, G., Giovannico, G., Rodeghiero, L., et al. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-07176-w · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- de Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J. J., & Dillman, D. A.
- ORCID
- de Leeuw, Edith D.
- Venue
- International Handbook of Survey Methodology
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2015-02-17
- OpenAlex
- W2439311862
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 34.28
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Keywords
- survey design, survey quality, coverage error, sampling error, nonresponse error, measurement error, sampling frame, probability sampling, response bias, operationalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review