The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; none of the 20 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The vulnerable subject: anchoring equality in the human condition
Open accessAbstract
In this chapter I develop the concept of vulnerability in order to argue for a more responsive state and a more egalitarian society. I argue that vulnerability is universal and constant, inherent in the human condition. The vulnerability approach I propose is an alternative to traditional equal protection analysis; it moves us beyond identity-based inquiries because it focuses not only on discrimination against defined groups, but is concerned with the privileges conferred on limited segments of the population by the state through its institutions. Therefore, vulnerability analyses concentrate on our social structures and institutions established to manage our common vulnerabilities. This approach has the potential to move us beyond the confines of current discrimination-based models toward a more substantive vision of equality. Theorizing a concept of vulnerability necessitates developing a more complex subject around which to build social policy and law; this new subject is useful in redefining and expanding current ideas about state responsibility toward individuals and institutions. In fact, I argue that the “vulnerable subject” must replace the autonomous and independent subject asserted in the liberal tradition. Far more representative of actual lived experience and the human condition, the vulnerable subject should be at the center of our political and theoretical endeavors. The vision of the state that would emerge in such an engagement would be more responsive to and responsible for the vulnerable subject, a reimagining that is essential to attaining a more equal society than currently exists in America. Before developing the vulnerability thesis, I will address some conceptual impediments to the idea of a more responsive state. First, an impoverished sense of equality is embedded in our current legal doctrine. We understand equality in formal terms, focused on discrimination and inattentive to underlying societal inequities. Second, the view that the state’s proper role is one of restraint and abstention is politically powerful. Even self-identified progressive social reformers are suspicious of the state; the rhetoric of non-intervention prevails in policy discussions, deterring positive measures designed to address inequalities. We idealize contract and correspondingly reify individual choice in ways that mask society’s role in perpetuating inequality. The fact that societal institutions play a significant role in perpetrating inequality is the very reason that we need a more active and responsive state.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
79 Own interpretation · 20 Sources not found
In the paper
“In 1999, the Supreme Court of Vermont looked into its own early American history and held that same-sex couples were entitled to receive the legal benefits and protections that were previously only afforded to married couples of opposite sexes.55”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > VI. A MORE POSITIVE EQUALITY
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [55]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Privileges and disadvantages accumulate across systems and can combine to create effects that are more devastating or more beneficial than the weight of each separate part.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 42 IV. ASSESSING AND ADDRESSING PRIVILEGE AND DISADVANTAGE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Politically, this limitedness is problematic because it can and has resulted in significant backlash.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 5. Id.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, contracts have no independent force; they are merely documents dependent on the institutions of the state to give them life through interpretation, implementation and execution.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > II. THE RESTRAINED STATE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Therefore, with respect to the assets any one person possesses, it is not multiple identities that intersect to produce compounded inequalities, as has been posited by some theorists, but rather systems of power and privilege that interact to produce webs of advantages and disadvantages.43”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 42 IV. ASSESSING AND ADDRESSING PRIVILEGE AND DISADVANTAGE
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [43]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These individual successes create both theoretical and empirical pitfalls: Successful individuals who belong to a designated suspect class can undermine the coherence and dilute the strength of critical analyses based on asserted bias against the same identity group.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 5. Id.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From a political and policy perspective, the current model of equality is further limited as an anti-discrimination principle because its protections do not appear to extend to everyone.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 5. Id.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No matter how we try to isolate transactions, the state is always a residual player in socalled private arrangements, having fashioned both the background rules that shape those agreements and maintaining the background institutions upon which parties ultimately rely.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > II. THE RESTRAINED STATE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Together and independently they provide us with what Peadar Kirby refers to as “assets”advantages, coping mechanisms, or resources that cushion us when we are facing misfortune, disaster, and violence.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 32
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Focusing on the interactions of asset-conferring institutions makes clear why some individuals can maneuver past disadvantages typically associated with our existing discrimination categories of race or gender to excel, even triumph, in a “white man's world.””
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 42 IV. ASSESSING AND ADDRESSING PRIVILEGE AND DISADVANTAGE
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 54
- It may state two separate claims as one. 25
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Vulnerability is typically associated with victimhood, deprivation, dependency, or pathology.20”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > III. THE VULNERABILITY THESIS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This approach has the potential to move us beyond the stifling confines of current discrimination-based models toward a more substantive vision of equality.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > INTRODUCTION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to the examples Kirby provides, employment systems should be added; like education and healthcare, they develop the human being, impart assets that allow participation in the market and, thus, facilitate the accumulation of material resources that help bolster individuals' resilience in the face of vulnerability.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These assets determine our present quality of life, and provide the material basis for accumulation of additional resources-or resources that are more sustainable-in the form of savings and investments.36”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Kirby argues persuasively that social assets are also accumulated through political collectives in which individuals bolster their resilience by joining together to address vulnerabilities generated by the market.41”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 38.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Vulnerability initially should be understood as arising from our embodiment, which carries with it the ever-present possibility of harm, injury, and misfortune from mildly adverse to catastrophically devastating events, whether accidental, intentional, or otherwise.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > III. THE VULNERABILITY THESIS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Contemplating our shared vulnerability it becomes apparent that human beings need each other, and that we must structure our institutions in response to this fundamental human reality.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > B. The Vulnerable Society and Its Institutions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In American legal culture, the idea of the private acts as a principle of restraint and abstention.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > II. THE RESTRAINED STATE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fact that nonintervention has facilitated a skewed and unequal society with the distance between rich and poor growing in recent years, makes clear that some form of prevailing power is essential to counter unfettered self-interest.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > II. THE RESTRAINED STATE
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even self-identified progressive social reformers are suspicious of the state; the rhetoric of non-intervention prevails in policy discussions, deterring positive measures designed to address inequalities.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Vulnerability is universal and, as such, transcends historic categories of impermissible discrimination.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 42 IV. ASSESSING AND ADDRESSING PRIVILEGE AND DISADVANTAGE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The sub-prime mortgage crisis affected white and middle-class people as well as those in the traditional suspect categories.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A first step in this reconception is understanding that the state itself is manifested through complex institutional arrangements.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > II. THE RESTRAINED STATE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Undeniably universal, human vulnerability is also particular: it is experienced uniquely by each of us and this experience is greatly influenced by the quality and quantity of resources we possess or can command.27”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > III. THE VULNERABILITY THESIS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of course, societal institutions themselves are not foolproof shelters, even in the short term.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > B. The Vulnerable Society and Its Institutions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unless some distortion is perceived to be introduced by impermissible bias, the state is not accountable.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > I. THE LIMITS OF FORMAL EQUALITY
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within the various systems for conferring assets, individuals are often positioned differently from one another, so that some are more privileged, while others are relatively disadvantaged.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 42 IV. ASSESSING AND ADDRESSING PRIVILEGE AND DISADVANTAGE
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One promising theoretical potential of making vulnerability central in an analysis of equality is that attention to the situation of the vulnerable individual leads us to redirect focus onto the societal institutions that are created in response to individual vulnerability.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > B. The Vulnerable Society and Its Institutions
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I argue that vulnerability is-and should be understood to be-universal and constant, inherent in the human condition.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Far more representative of actual lived experience and the human condition, the vulnerable subject should be at the center of our political and theoretical endeavors.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > INTRODUCTION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Individuals can attempt to lessen the risk or mitigate the impact of such events, but they cannot eliminate their possibility.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > III. THE VULNERABILITY THESIS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sometimes privileges conferred within certain systems can mediate or even cancel out disadvantages conferred in others.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 42 IV. ASSESSING AND ADDRESSING PRIVILEGE AND DISADVANTAGE
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“These collectives historically included trade unions and political parties, but todayas Kirby recognizes-the welfare state and insurance are also offered as alternative, often competing, means of protection against risk.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 38.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Vulnerability is a more encompassing concept and, for that reason, analyses centered around vulnerability are more politically potent than those based on dependency.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 29
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The vulnerable subject approach does what the one-dimensional liberal subject approach cannot: it embodies the fact that human reality encompasses a wide range of differing and interdependent abilities over the span of a lifetime.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These individuals do not disprove the existence of structural inequalities or the need for remedial action, however.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 42 IV. ASSESSING AND ADDRESSING PRIVILEGE AND DISADVANTAGE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Current conceptions of privacy are based on this dichotomy, which places some things and institutions presumptively beyond state regulation and control.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > II. THE RESTRAINED STATE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“State restraint is often expressed in terms of the separate spheres ideology: there is a contrast between public and private domains, with the state cast as the quintessential public entity and the family cast as essentially private.9”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > II. THE RESTRAINED STATE
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Finally, social assets are networks of relationships from which we gain support and strength, including the family and other cultural groupings and associations.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 38.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“What is more, sameness of treatment has been used to argue increasingly effectively against measures like affirmative action that might generate remedies for past inequities.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 5. Id.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Important to the consideration of privilege is the fact that these systems interact in ways that further affect these inequalities.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 42 IV. ASSESSING AND ADDRESSING PRIVILEGE AND DISADVANTAGE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The formal equality model therefore not only fails to take into account existing inequality of circumstances, it also fails to disrupt persistent forms of inequality.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > I. THE LIMITS OF FORMAL EQUALITY
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Vulnerability analysis questions the idea of a liberal subject, suggesting that the vulnerable subject is a more accurate and complete universal figure to place at the heart of social policy.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 29
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because neither inequalities nor the systems that produce them are inevitable, they can also be objects of reform.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 5. Id.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The nature of this relationship, coupled with the fact that asset conferring institutions initially are brought into legal existence only through state mechanisms, places such institutions within the domain of state responsibility.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 38.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further, we idealize contract and correspondingly reify individual choice in ways that mask society's role in perpetuating inequality.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, the view that the proper role of the state is one of restraint and abstention is politically powerful.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The vulnerability approach recognizes that individuals are anchored at each end of their lives by dependency and the absence of capacity.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“In this regard, identity categories are both overand under-inclusive.7”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 5. Id.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites FINEMAN, THE ILLUSION OF EQUALITY, supra note 2
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Formal equality leaves undisturbed-and may even serve to validate--existing institutional arrangements that privilege some and disadvantage others.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > I. THE LIMITS OF FORMAL EQUALITY
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Kirby identifies health and education as chief among assets in this category, making the institutions governing education and health 40 care prime candidates for a vulnerability analysis.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fact that nonintervention has facilitated a skewed and unequal society with the distance between rich and poor growing in recent years, makes clear that some form of prevailing power is essential to counter unfettered self-interest.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > II. THE RESTRAINED STATE
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The state, in exercising its unique role as the creator of legitimate social organizations susceptible to its ongoing coercive authority, should assume a corresponding responsibility to see that these organizations operate in an equitable manner.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > II. THE RESTRAINED STATE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The institutions of particular interest are those that are created and maintained under the legitimating authority of the state, since the ultimate objective of a vulnerability analysis is to argue that the state must be more responsive to, and responsible for, vulnerability.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > B. The Vulnerable Society and Its Institutions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The state facilitated institutions that have grown up around vulnerability are interlocking and overlapping, creating the possibility of layered opportunities and support for individuals, but also containing gaps and potential pitfalls.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 32
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Cumulatively these assets provide individuals with “resilience” in the face of vulnerability.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 32
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As such, vulnerability analysis concentrates on the structures our society has and will establish to manage our common vulnerabilities.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Certainly tax and inheritance laws impact the distribution of physical assets and are part of this system, but so also are banking rules and regulations, and credit policies.37”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intent is irrelevant, what matters is whether or not these institutions are structured so as to respond unequally to the reality of our shared vulnerability.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The realization that disadvantage is produced independent of racial and gender biases in many-but of course not all-instances provides an important political tool.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 42 IV. ASSESSING AND ADDRESSING PRIVILEGE AND DISADVANTAGE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A vulnerability analysis greatly magnifies state responsibility for the institutions and structures the state constructs and utilizes.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This focus on the structuring of societal institutions reflects the fact that the state has an affirmative obligation not to privilege any group of citizens over others and to actively structure conditions for equality.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The Vermont Constitution's Common Benefits Clause predated the Fourteenth Amendment and was not based on a concept of discrimination, 5 7 nor was it focused only on protection for a specific category of persons.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > VI. A MORE POSITIVE EQUALITY
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [57]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Baker employs a creative and positive mode of inquiry in line with the vulnerability approach: It is concerned with whether the state, in fashioning its institutions, acts with equal regard for the shared vulnerability of all its legal subjects.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > VI. A MORE POSITIVE EQUALITY
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our current system has been built upon myths of autonomy and independence and thus fails to reflect the vulnerable as well as dependent nature of the human condition.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They can be compromised by legacies of practices, patterns of behavior, and entrenched interests that were formed during periods of exclusion and discrimination, but are now invisible in a haze of lost history.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Vulnerability analysis demands that the state give equal regard to the shared vulnerability of all individuals, transcending the old identity categories as a limitation on the recognition that the state has a vital role to play in protecting against discrimination.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mobilizing around the concept of shared, inevitable vulnerability may allow us to more easily build coalitions among those who have not benefited as fully as others from current societal organization.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 42 IV. ASSESSING AND ADDRESSING PRIVILEGE AND DISADVANTAGE
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Certainly state mechanisms that ensure a more equitable distribution of assets and privilege across society would contribute to a more robust democracy and greater public participation.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A vulnerability inquiry proposes a more thorough and penetrating equality analysis--one that considers structural and institutional arrangements in assessing the state's response to situations of vulnerability before indicting the individual.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Welfare reform during the 1990s should have been understood as a direct attack on all caretakers in that it undermined the value of unpaid care work and demonized motherhood outside of the patriarchal paradigm.45”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 42 IV. ASSESSING AND ADDRESSING PRIVILEGE AND DISADVANTAGE
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [45]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Remember that institutions as well as individuals are vulnerable to both internal and external forces.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rather the state is required to ensure that institutions and structures within its control do not inappropriately benefit or disadvantage certain members of society.”
§ The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition > 2008]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
The state is an appropriate actor to ensure equality.
“The state, in exercising its unique role as the creator of legitimate social organizations susceptible to its ongoing coercive authority, should assume a corresponding responsibility to see that these organizations operate in an equitable manner.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The sub-prime mortgage crisis affected white and middle-class people as well as those in the traditional suspect categories.
“The sub-prime mortgage crisis affected white and middle-class people as well as those in the traditional suspect categories.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Institutions are simultaneously constituted by and producers of vulnerability.
“Because institutions are simultaneously constituted by and producers of vulnerability, we must continually challenge these institutional practices and the meting of social resources.”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 429
Empowerment in the Relational Longitudinal Space of Vulnerability
Emmel, N. D. (2017) · Social Policy and Society · doi:10.1017/s1474746417000021 · Cited by 18
In defence of posthuman vulnerability
Liedo, B., & Rueda, J. (2021) · Scientia et Fides · doi:10.12775/setf.2021.008 · Cited by 17
The Vulnerability of Heterosexuality: Consent, Gender Deception and Embodiment
Travis, M. (2018) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/0964663918773151 · Cited by 17
Yu, S.-S. V., & Smith, M. J. (2014) · Security Journal · doi:10.1057/sj.2014.6 · Cited by 17
Andersson, U. B., & Edgren, M. (2018) · NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research · doi:10.1080/08038740.2018.1472140 · Cited by 17
Caraher, K., & Reuter, E. (2017) · Social Policy and Society · doi:10.1017/s1474746417000033 · Cited by 17
Rungius, C., Schneider, E., & Weller, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-19222-8_3 · Cited by 17
Emotional Androgyny: A Preventive Factor of Psychosocial Risks at Work?
Gartzia, L., Pizarro, J., & Baniandrés, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02144 · Cited by 19
McGinley, A. C. (2016) · New York University Press eBooks · doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814764039.001.0001 · Cited by 16
Vulnerability and Critical Theory
Ferrarese, E. (2018) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004367906 · Cited by 18
Vulnerability, Care and the Constitutional State
Ré, L. (2020) · Revista de Estudos Constitucionais Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito · doi:10.4013/rechtd.2019.113.01 · Cited by 16
Legal Aid and the Future of Access to Justice
Denvir, C., Kinghan, J., Mant, J., & Newman, D. C. (2023) · Hart Publishing eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781509957835 · Cited by 16
Hirsh, C. E. (2013) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213503328 · Cited by 15
Law’s boundaries: Connections in contemporary legal professionalism
Francis, A. M. (2020) · Journal of Professions and Organization · doi:10.1093/jpo/joaa003 · Cited by 16
The good, the bad, and the ‘vulnerable older adult’
Pritchard‐Jones, L. (2016) · Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law · doi:10.1080/09649069.2016.1145838 · Cited by 16
Keeling, A. (2017) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.05.005 · Cited by 20
Relational Vulnerability: The Legal Status of Cohabiting Carers
Gordon-Bouvier, E. (2019) · Feminist Legal Studies · doi:10.1007/s10691-019-09404-3 · Cited by 16
Barbera, M. L. (2017) · Investigaciones Feministas · doi:10.5209/infe.54858 · Cited by 15
The vulnerable adult experiment: Situating vulnerability in adult safeguarding law and policy
Keywood, K. (2017) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.05.011 · Cited by 15
Against Nature, against Consent: A Sexual Politics of Debility
Fischel, J. J. (2013) · differences · doi:10.1215/10407391-2140591 · Cited by 14
‘What Does the Term Refugee Mean to You?’: Perspectives from Syrian Refugee Women in Lebanon
Gissi, A. (2019) · Journal of Refugee Studies · doi:10.1093/jrs/fey046 · Cited by 14
Charging ‘overseas visitors’ for NHS treatment, from Bevan to Windrush and beyond
McHale, J. V., & Speakman, E. M. (2020) · Legal Studies · doi:10.1017/lst.2020.26 · Cited by 14
Fragility, uncertainty, and healthcare
Rogers, W., & Walker, M. J. (2016) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1007/s11017-016-9350-3 · Cited by 14
Serughetti, G. (2018) · Anti-Trafficking Review · doi:10.14197/atr.201218112 · Cited by 14
Introduction: Vulnerability and Social Justice
Brown, K. (2017) · Social Policy and Society · doi:10.1017/s1474746416000622 · Cited by 13
Vulnerability, Space and Conflict-Related Sexual Violence: Building Spatial Resilience
Clark, J. N. (2020) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038520918560 · Cited by 13
Detention in the 'War on Terror': Can Human Rights Fight Back?
de Londras, F. (2011) · Cited by 13
Vulnerability in Domestic Discourses on Trafficking: Lessons from the Indian Experience
Kotiswaran, P. (2012) · Feminist Legal Studies · doi:10.1007/s10691-012-9211-z · Cited by 13
Some are more ‘equal’ than others: heteronormativity in the post-White era of financial remedies
Bendall, C. (2014) · Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law · doi:10.1080/09649069.2014.933589 · Cited by 13
Singh, S. (2017) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/0964663916682825 · Cited by 13
Contemporary Narratives of Ageing, Illness, Care
Sako, K., & Falcus, S. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003058618 · Cited by 12
The vulnerable subject of negligence law
Stychin, C. F. (2012) · International Journal of Law in Context · doi:10.1017/s1744552312000249 · Cited by 12
Maternal Healthcare in Bangladesh and Gender Equity: A Review Article
Walton, L. M., & Schbley, B. (2013) · Journal of Health Ethics · doi:10.18785/ojhe.0901.08 · Cited by 12
Gender Justice v. The “Invisible Hand” of Gender Bias in Law and Society
Beaumont, E. (2016) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12260 · Cited by 11
WHAT VULNERABILITY? WHOSE VULNERABILITY? CONFLICT OF UNDERSTANDINGS IN THE DEBATE ON VULNERABILITY
Zagorac, I. (2017) · Facta Universitatis Series Law and Politics · doi:10.22190/fulp1701157z · Cited by 12
Yüksekdağ, Y. (2017) · Health Care Analysis · doi:10.1007/s10728-017-0342-x · Cited by 12
Developing Vulnerability: A Situational Response to the Abuse of Women with Mental Disabilities
Lindsey, J. (2016) · Feminist Legal Studies · doi:10.1007/s10691-016-9330-z · Cited by 11
Coronavirus as a Catalyst to Transform Consumer Policy and Enforcement
Riefa, C. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Policy · doi:10.1007/s10603-020-09462-0 · Cited by 11
van Holstein, E., Wiesel, I., Bigby, C., & Gleeson, B. J. (2022) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.12595 · Cited by 11
Does the new EU Regulation on clinical trials adequately protect vulnerable research participants?
Gennet, É., Andorno, R., & Elger, B. S. (2015) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.04.007 · Cited by 11
A Criminological Reading of the Concept of Vulnerability
de Pérez, J. L. (2015) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/0964663915593411 · Cited by 11
Digital Vulnerability: The Unequal Risk of E-Contact with the Criminal Justice System
Vargas, Preito-Hodge, K., & Christofferson (2019) · RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences · doi:10.7758/rsf.2019.5.1.04 · Cited by 11
Dinner, D. (2010) · Law and History Review · doi:10.1017/s0738248010000581 · Cited by 11
Sustaining Life: Rethinking Modes of Agency in Vulnerability
Page, T. (2018) · Australian Feminist Studies · doi:10.1080/08164649.2018.1547629 · Cited by 10
The Vulnerability of Other Animals
Thierman, S. (2011) · Cited by 10
Duties to Care: Dementia, Relationality and Law
Harding, R. (2017) · Cited by 10
Samata, S. (2017) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2017-0060 · Cited by 10
Novkov, J. L. (2019) · Journal of Women Politics & Policy · doi:10.1080/1554477x.2019.1563412 · Cited by 10
Medical Evidence and Expertise in Abortion Jurisprudence
Ahmed, A. (2014) · American Journal of Law & Medicine · doi:10.1177/0098858815591510 · Cited by 12
Kiwanuka, M. A. N. (2021) · International Journal of Discrimination and the Law · doi:10.1177/13582291211031381 · Cited by 10
Ruggiu, D. (2019) · Philosophy of Management · doi:10.1007/s40926-019-00119-8 · Cited by 9
Heightened vulnerabilities and better care for all: Disability and end-of-life care
Stienstra, D., D'Aubin, A., & Derksen, J. (2012) · Palliative & Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s147895151100054x · Cited by 9
Injury in the Unresponsive State
Fineman, M. A. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108332934.003 · Cited by 9
Self-citationA Feminist Reading of Italy’s North–South Dualism in the Wake of COVID-19
Corsi, M., Aloè, E., & Zacchia, G. (2021) · Feminist Economics · doi:10.1080/13545701.2021.1876904 · Cited by 9
Warum die Bioethik ein Konzept von Vulnerabilität benötigt
Rogers, W., Mackenzie, C., & Dodds, S. (2021) · Grundlagentexte zur angewandten Ethik · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-27696-6_10 · Cited by 9
Politics, Justice and the Vulnerable Subject: The Contribution of Feminist Thought
Casalini, B. (2016) · Gênero & Direito · doi:10.18351/2179-7137/ged.v5n3p15-29 · Cited by 9
Andriessen, T., van der Horst, H. M., & Morrow, O. (2025) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-025-10715-2 · Cited by 8
Vulnerability in the EU AI Act: building an interpretation
Rebrean, M.-L., & Malgieri, G. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732133 · Cited by 17
Take Pity: What Disability Rights Can Learn from Religious Charity
Braswell, H. (2022) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhac017 · Cited by 8
Widows, Widowhood, and Society in Africa
Fasanmi, A. O., & Ayivor, S. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77030-7_33-1 · Cited by 10
Los imperativos éticos de la pandemia de COVID-19: Un análisis desde la ética de los datos
Arriagada-Bruneau, G., Gilthorpe, M. S., & Müller, V. C. (2020) · Veritas · doi:10.4067/s0718-92732020000200013 · Cited by 13
Equality Bodies: advancing towards more responsive designs?
Lahuerta, S. B. (2021) · International Journal of Law in Context · doi:10.1017/s1744552321000240 · Cited by 8
Orloff, A. S., & Laperrière, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198828389.013.20 · Cited by 8
Responding to vulnerability: The case of injection drug use
Ben‐Ishai, E. (2012) · International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics · doi:10.3138/ijfab.5.2.39 · Cited by 8
Human Suffering and the Quest for Cosmopolitan Solidarity: A Buddhist Perspective
Ward, E. (2013) · Journal of International Political Theory · doi:10.3366/jipt.2013.0051 · Cited by 8
Review article: : The many faces of vulnerability
Brown, K., Ecclestone, K., & Emmel, N. D. (2017) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 8
Not ‘us’ and ‘them’: towards a normative legal theory of mental health vulnerability
Bielby, P. (2018) · International Journal of Law in Context · doi:10.1017/s1744552318000149 · Cited by 8
Macioce, F. (2019) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-019-09900-w · Cited by 8
Vulnerable bodies, vulnerable systems
Philippopoulos‐Mihalopoulos, A., & Webb, T. E. (2015) · International Journal of Law in Context · doi:10.1017/s1744552315000294 · Cited by 7
Pividori, C., & Degani, P. (2018) · Global Jurist · doi:10.1515/gj-2017-0028 · Cited by 10
Social bodies and social justice
Lewis, S., & Thomson, M. (2019) · International Journal of Law in Context · doi:10.1017/s1744552319000053 · Cited by 7
Conditional Vulnerability: Rape Narratives in Swedish Courts, 1990–2014
Edgren, M. (2019) · Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13852-3_3 · Cited by 7
Greer’s ‘Bad Sex’ and the Future of Consent
Brooks, V. (2019) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-019-09671-x · Cited by 7
The line of vulnerability in a recovery assemblage
Sultan, A., & Duff, C. (2022) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103740 · Cited by 7
Vulnerability and globalisation: mediating impacts on society
Kirby, P. (2011) · Journal of Human Rights and the Environment · doi:10.4337/jhre.2011.01.05 · Cited by 7
Beaudry, J.-S. (2016) · The Global Journal of Animal Law · Cited by 7
Gelabert, T. S. (2021) · Isegoría · doi:10.3989/isegoria.2021.64.02 · Cited by 13
Community Engagement in Irelands Developmental Welfare State
Carney, G. M., Dundon, T., & Léime, Á. N. (2011) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) · doi:10.13025/21523 · Cited by 7
de Stefani, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Dynamics · doi:10.3389/fhumd.2022.861178 · Cited by 6
“Embedded Consumer”: Towards a Constitutional Reframing of the Legal Image of Consumers in EU law
Ouyang, J. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Policy · doi:10.1007/s10603-024-09570-1 · Cited by 6
Poverty, Race and Vulnerability
Atkins, S. (2015) · The International Journal of Children s Rights · doi:10.1163/15718182-02302005 · Cited by 6
A Theoretical Framework: A Human Rights Reading of SOGI Asylum Based on Feminist and Queer Studies
Danisi, C., Dustin, M., Ferreira, N., & Held, N. (2021) · IMISCOE research series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69441-8_3 · Cited by 6
Four Paradigm Cases of Dependency in Care Relations
van der Weele, S. (2021) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2021.10 · Cited by 6
Human rights: Law, language and the bare human being
Mooney, A. (2012) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2011.12.001 · Cited by 7
Domańska, M. (2018) · Białostockie Studia Prawnicze · doi:10.15290/bsp.2018.23.04.02 · Cited by 6
Vulnerability and the Consenting Subject: Reimagining Informed Consent in Embryo Donation
Hewer, R. (2019) · Feminist Legal Studies · doi:10.1007/s10691-019-09414-1 · Cited by 6
Towards a new horizon : in search of a renewing socio-juridical imaginaryPreprint
Grear, A. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.15496/publikation-53949 · Cited by 6
Students’ experienced harm at higher education institutions: A qualitative study
Osuna, A. I., Darcy, K. M., Prior, S., Olson, T., & Hamm, J. A. (2024) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-024-09756-y · Cited by 5
Lau, P. L. (2025) · Law Technology and Humans · doi:10.5204/lthj.3845 · Cited by 7
Fear Generalization and Mnemonic Injustice
Trakas, M., & Puddifoot, K. (2024) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2023.60 · Cited by 5
Introduction: When Is a Child a Slave?
Duane, A. M. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316412312.001 · Cited by 5
From Need to Hope: The American Family and Poverty in Partisan Discourse, 1900–2012
Alphonso, G. M. (2015) · Journal of Policy History · doi:10.1017/s0898030615000287 · Cited by 5
Human versus Inalienable Rights: Is there still a future for online protest in the Anonymous world?
Gillen, M. (2012) · European journal of law and technology · Cited by 5
Conceptualizing Consent: How Prosecutors Identify Sexual Victimization in Statutory Rape Cases
Small, J. L. (2020) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1017/lsi.2019.71 · Cited by 6
Nowhere Home: The Waiting of Vulnerable Child Refugees
Lysaker, O. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37382-5_5 · Cited by 5
Quintero, R. M., & Wences, I. (2020) · Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional · doi:10.22201/iij.24487872e.2020.20.14474 · Cited by 5
Santoro, E. (2021) · Revista de Estudos Constitucionais Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito · doi:10.4013/rechtd.2020.123.01 · Cited by 5
Bindley, K., Lewis, J. M., Travaglia, J., & DiGiacomo, M. L. (2021) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.13339 · Cited by 5
Professional Responsibility: Conceptual Rescue and Plea for Reform
Delacroix, S. (2021) · Oxford Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1093/ojls/gqab010 · Cited by 12
COVID-19 magnifies the vulnerabilities: The Brazilian case
Denny, D. M. T., Duarte, C. S., de Castro, D., & Pereira, L. I. (2021) · International Journal of Discrimination and the Law · doi:10.1177/13582291211031374 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- FINEMAN, M. A.
- Corresponding author
- MARTHA ALBERTSON FINEMAN
- Venue
- Transcending the Boundaries of Law
- Publisher
- Routledge-Cavendish
- Published
- 2010-07-12
- Pages
- 177-191
- OpenAlex
- W3121891619
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 216.52
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Keywords
- vulnerability, vulnerable subjects, equality, equal protection, substantive equality, state responsibility, liberalism, individualism, institutional inequality, social policy, non-interventionism, contract theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
