Cited by 149Political Philosophy and EthicsPolitical Theory and InfluencePhilosophical Ethics and Theory

Autonomy and Liberalism

Colburn, Ben·2010·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

This book concerns the foundations and implications of a particular form of liberal political theory. Colburn argues that one should see liberalism as a political theory committed to the value of autonomy, understood as consisting in an agent deciding for oneself what is valuable and living life in accordance with that decision. Understanding liberalism this way offers solutions to various problems that beset liberal political theory, on various levels. On the theoretical level, Colburn claims that this position is the only defensible theory of liberalism in current circulation, arguing that other more dominant theories are either self-contradictory or unattractive on closer inspection. And on the practical level, Colburn draws out the substantive commitments of this position in educational, economic, and social policy. Hence, the study provides a blueprint for a radical liberal political agenda which will be of interest to philosophers and to politicians alike.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203855331

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • eBCIs may be less threatening to authenticity when paired with an existentialist approach, according to which being true to oneself means living in accordance with values one has reflectively endorsed.

    “However, eBCIs may be less threatening to authenticity when paired with an existentialist approach to authenticity (e.g., [59–61]), which says that that being true to oneself means living in accordance with values that one has reflectively endorsed.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colburn, B.
Corresponding author
Colburn, Ben
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2010-01-21
OpenAlex
W112201882
Cited by
149
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.99
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Influence
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords
liberalism, political autonomy, self-determination, liberal political theory, radical liberalism, political education, economic policy, social policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review