Autonomy and Liberalism
Abstract
This book concerns the foundations and implications of a particular form of liberal political theory. Colburn argues that one should see liberalism as a political theory committed to the value of autonomy, understood as consisting in an agent deciding for oneself what is valuable and living life in accordance with that decision. Understanding liberalism this way offers solutions to various problems that beset liberal political theory, on various levels. On the theoretical level, Colburn claims that this position is the only defensible theory of liberalism in current circulation, arguing that other more dominant theories are either self-contradictory or unattractive on closer inspection. And on the practical level, Colburn draws out the substantive commitments of this position in educational, economic, and social policy. Hence, the study provides a blueprint for a radical liberal political agenda which will be of interest to philosophers and to politicians alike.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
eBCIs may be less threatening to authenticity when paired with an existentialist approach, according to which being true to oneself means living in accordance with values one has reflectively endorsed.
“However, eBCIs may be less threatening to authenticity when paired with an existentialist approach to authenticity (e.g., [59–61]), which says that that being true to oneself means living in accordance with values that one has reflectively endorsed.”
From Ethical considerations for the use of brain–computer interfaces for cognitive enhancement (2024) · cites this paper as [61]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ethical considerations for the use of brain–computer interfaces for cognitive enhancement
Gordon, E. C., & Seth, A. K. (2024) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002899 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
- Authors
- Colburn, B.
- Corresponding author
- Colburn, Ben
- ORCID
- Colburn, Ben
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2010-01-21
- OpenAlex
- W112201882
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Influence
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- liberalism, political autonomy, self-determination, liberal political theory, radical liberalism, political education, economic policy, social policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review