The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chinese Christianity: indigenization and conflict
Abstract
An unforeseen consequence of the policies and social changes of the Reform Era has been an enormous growth in religious belief. After being severely restricted in the first decade and a half of the Maoist era, virtually all forms of public religious practice were suppressed during the Cultural Revolution, and replaced by a quasi-religious cult of Mao, complete with sacred texts (the Little Red Book), rituals (loyalty dances), and claims of miracles. But amid the chaos of the Cultural Revolution, the Mao cult imploded. After the death of Mao and the overthrow of his close associates, the Deng Xiaoping regime relaxed restrictions on religious practice-and the mobility and freedoms of an expanding market economy made many remaining restrictions easy to subvert. In this environment, hundreds of religious flowers began to bloom, some of them replications of pre-revolutionary religious forms, many others new mutations of the old. According to government official figures, there are over 100 million religious believers in China today. A recent study in an authoritative journal by a team of researchers at Shanghai University, however, put the number at 300 million. But even this is probably under-estimated. If we consider “religion” to include any form of evocation of supernatural powers-and therefore traditional folk practices like burning incense to gods or ancestors at life cycle rituals or at seasonal festivals-then, according to Peter Ng, a religious studies scholar at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, as much as 95 percent of the Chinese population might be considered religious to some degree.1
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“And Christian networks are wide, flexible communities whose members can receive the Spirit while praying in small groups without relying on fancy localized temples (Madsen 2010).”
From Secular Belief, Religious Belonging in China (2014) · cites this paper as Madsen 2010
Citations
Cited by
Secular Belief, Religious Belonging in China
Madsen, R. (2014) · Review of Religion and Chinese Society · doi:10.1163/22143955-04102003 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- MADSEN, R.
- Corresponding author
- RICHARD MADSEN
- Venue
- Chinese Society
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2010-04-05
- Pages
- 257-278
- OpenAlex
- W4231772966
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Christian Theology and Mission
- Keywords
- Christianity in China, indigenization, religious reform, Cultural Revolution, religious revival, religious freedom, folk religion, religious pluralism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review