The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Doing News Framing Analysis
Abstract
Walter Lippmann coined the famous phrase “the pictures in our heads” in 1922 (Lippmann, 1922), yet the importance of images for social scientifi c study has remained undervalued even as late as 1990, when Doris Graber (1990) issued her call for more research on television visuals. As Graber noted, the study of visual information in news stories is stymied by a lack of appropriate theories and methodological hurdles. Today, framing theory has emerged as one of the life lines for visual research. As Messaris and Abraham (2001) spelled out in the bible of framing theory, Framing Public Life (Reese, Gandy, & Grant, 2001), “the special qualities of visuals…makes them very effective tools for framing” (p. 220). Even Erving Goffman, the sociologist who was the earliest to describe frame analysis theory, recognized the potential of photographs when he conducted his study of gender frames in advertising images (Goffman, 1979).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rodriguez, L., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2011) · Journal of Visual Literacy · doi:10.1080/23796529.2011.11674684 · Cited by 380
Geise, S., & Baden, C. (2015) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/comt.12048 · Cited by 259
D'angelo, P. (2019) · The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies · doi:10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0021 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2010-02-26
- OpenAlex
- W2613550695
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.21
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doing News Framing Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203864463
- The paper
- Doing News Framing Analysis. (2010). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864463
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
