CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 192Photography and Visual CultureImpact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Look At Us: Collective Narcissism in College Student Facebook Photo Galleries

ANDREW L . MENDELSON AND ZIZI PAPACHARISSI·2010·A Networked Self
DOI 10.4324/9780203876527-20
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In recent years the popularity of social network sites (SNSs), such as Friendster, MySpace, and Facebook, has expanded, enabling a culture of remote connectivity for young adults maintaining a variety of social ties to primary and secondary groups of contact. This is especially true for college-age adults who use SNSs to stay connected with friends and family dispersed across remote or nearby locations. These networked platforms of socially oriented activity permit an introduction of the self via public displays of connection (boyd & Ellison, 2007; Donath & boyd, 2004; Papacharissi, 2002a, 2002b, 2009). A subsequent networked presentation of the self involves performative elements, using a variety of tools and strategies to present tastes, likes, dislikes, affiliations, and in general, personality. Such a performative palette on sites like Facebook might include listings of interests and favorite music, films, and books, linking to groups sharing points of view or interests, posting of comments and responses, and, relevant to this chapter, posting and labeling of photographs of one’s self and one’s friends. The purpose of this chapter is to examine the use of photo galleries as an instrument of self presentation and a means of visual autobiography online. Photographs have long served a significant function of preserving biographical memories. Albums of photographs-from tintype and cabinet card albums in the mid-and late 1800s to digital galleries in the twenty-first century-are used to tell and retell experiences shared by members of one’s family and by one’s wider social circle. These photographs serve as mnemonic devices for the moments that bond us together, sparking larger conversations within families (Chalfen, 1987). Further, they allows us, as Barthes (1981) suggests, to search through the past and rediscover the truth of our loved ones. Similarly, the manner in which college students portray themselves and tag others through photographs on Facebook is a contemporary means of introducing the self and performing one’s identity. How do the photos selected, presented, and tagged help reify this mediated performance? If photos are taken for the purpose of being displayed and tagged, does this render the experiences and the social relationships presented more real? College students consciously upload and tag displayed photographs, thus selecting certain subjects and events to emphasize. Inspired by Chalfen’s (1987) examination of “how we construct, manipulate, interpret, live with, participate in, and generally use visual symbolic forms” (p. 5), we examine how visual imagery is employed to present the self and everyday college life via Facebook photo galleries. In this study, we interrogate the photographs college students present of themselves as important forms of symbolic creation of their worlds.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203876527-20

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bauman, Z. (2005). Liquid life. Cambridge: Polity.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–192 of 192

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
PAPACHARISSI, A. L. M. A. Z.
Corresponding author
ANDREW L . MENDELSON AND ZIZI PAPACHARISSI
Venue
A Networked Self
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2010-09-10
Pages
259-281
DOI
10.4324/9780203876527-20
OpenAlex
W2277389970
Cited by
192
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
350.26
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Photography and Visual Culture
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
collective narcissism, university students, self-presentation, visual autobiography, photo tagging, visual semiotics, biographical memory, social network sites, visual culture, social media self-presentation, visual rhetoric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review