The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Civilization and Empire
Abstract
This book critically examines the influence of International Society on East Asia, and how its attempts to introduce ‘civilization’ to ‘barbarous’ polities contributed to conflict between China and Japan. Challenging existing works that have presented the expansion of (European) International Society as a progressive, linear process, this book contends that imperialism – along with an ideology premised on ‘civilising’ ‘barbarous’ peoples – played a central role in its historic development. Considering how these elements of International Society affected China and Japan’s entry into it, Shogo Suzuki contends that such states envisaged a Janus-faced International Society, which simultaneously aimed for cooperative relations among its ‘civilized’ members and for the introduction of ‘civilization’ towards non-European polities, often by coercive means. By examining the complex process by which China and Japan engaged with this dualism, this book highlights a darker side of China and Japan’s socialization into International Society which previous studies have failed to acknowledge. Drawing on Chinese and Japanese primary sources seldom utilized in International Relations, this book makes a compelling case for revising our understandings of International Society and its expansion. This book will be of strong interest to students and researcher of international relations, international history, European studies and Asian Studies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The acceptance of European norms was not always voluntary, but sometimes indirectly coercive and a subjugating process.”
From Imagining the Middle East: the state, nationalism and regional international society (2015) · cites this paper as Suzuki 2009
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adler‐Nissen, R. (2014) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818313000337 · Cited by 619
Mattern, J. B., & Zarakol, A. (2016) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818316000126 · Cited by 498
The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary
Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108647670 · Cited by 375
The Eurocentric conception of world politics: Western international theory, 1760-2010
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-2915 · Cited by 271
Governing the world at a distance: the practice of global benchmarking
Broome, A., & Quirk, J. (2015) · Review of International Studies · doi:10.1017/s0260210515000340 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Suzuki, S.
- Corresponding author
- Suzuki, Shogo
- ORCID
- Suzuki, Shogo
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2009-02-02
- OpenAlex
- W3108697194
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 8.27
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Japanese History and Culture
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Keywords
- international society, civilization and barbarism, imperialism, Japan-China relations, East Asia, European expansion, civilizing mission, coercion, Japan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review