The DOI matches its Crossref record.
World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives
Abstract
SCMS Award Winner "Best Edited Collection" The standard analytical category of "national cinema" has increasingly been called into question by the category of the "transnational." This anthology examines the premises and consequences of the coexistence of these two categories and the parameters of historiographical approaches that cross the borders of nation-states. The three sections of World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives cover the geopolitical imaginary, transnational cinematic institutions, and the uneven flow of words and images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Concepts of transnational cinema: towards a critical transnationalism in film studies
Higbee, W., & Lim, S. H. (2010) · Transnational Cinemas · doi:10.1386/trac.1.1.7/1 · Cited by 414
Before 1962: The Case for 1950s China-India History
Ghosh, A. (2017) · The Journal of Asian Studies · doi:10.1017/s0021911817000456 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2009-09-10
- OpenAlex
- W2336663882
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203882795
- The paper
- World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives. (2009). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203882795
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
