The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory
Abstract
This book proposes a novel approach to practising social and political analysis based on the role of logics. The authors articulate a distinctive perspective on social science explanation that avoids the problems of scientism and subjectivism by steering a careful course between lawlike explanations and thick descriptions. Drawing upon hermeneutics, poststructuralism, psychoanalysis, and post-analytical philosophy, this new approach offers a particular set of logics – social, political and fantasmatic – with which to construct critical explanations of practices and regimes. While the first part of the book critically engages with lawlike, interpretivist and causal approaches to critical explanation, the second part elaborates an alternative grammar of concepts informed by an ontological stance rooted in poststructuralist theory. In developing this approach, a number of empirical cases are included to illustrate its basic concepts and logics, ranging from the apartheid regime in South Africa to recent changes in higher education. The book will be a valuable tool for scholars and researchers in a variety of related fields of study in the social sciences, especially the disciplines of political science and political theory, international relations, social theory, cultural studies, anthropology and philosophy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2019) · Language, Counter-Memory, Practice · doi:10.1515/9781501741913-008 · Cited by 1,935
Hay, C. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-24106-4_11 · Cited by 247
Cited by
The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315739342 · Cited by 785
De Cleen, B., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2017) · Javnost - The Public · doi:10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083 · Cited by 571
Cultural political economy and critical policy studies
Jessop, B. (2010) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171003619741 · Cited by 521
On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology
Friedrichs, J., & Kratochwil, F. (2009) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818309990142 · Cited by 473
Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four ‘positions’
Dahlberg, L. (2011) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444810389569 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Glynos, J., & Howarth, D.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2007-09-12
- OpenAlex
- W1550301328
- Cited by
- 1,365
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.48
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203934753
- The paper
- Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. (2007). Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934753
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.