A Theory of Adaptation
Abstract
A Theory of Adaptation explores the continuous development of creative adaptation, and argues that the practice of adapting is central to the story-telling imagination. Linda Hutcheon develops a theory of adaptation through a range of media, from film and opera, to video games, pop music and theme parks, analysing the breadth, scope and creative possibilities within each. This new edition is supplemented by a new preface from the author, discussing both new adaptive forms/platforms and recent critical developments in the study of adaptation. It also features an illuminating new epilogue from Siobhan O’Flynn, focusing on adaptation in the context of digital media. She considers the impact of transmedia practices and properties on the form and practice of adaptation, as well as studying the extension of game narrative across media platforms, fan-based adaptation (from Twitter and Facebook to home movies), and the adaptation of books to digital formats. A Theory of Adaptation is the ideal guide to this ever evolving field of study and is essential reading for anyone interested in adaptation in the context of literary and media studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adaptation includes both reusing and creating, giving new meaning by shifting contexts.
“Linda Hutcheon (2006) argues that adaptation includes both reusing and creating, giving new meaning by shifting contexts.”
From Algorithmic Storytelling and Vernacular Folklore: Rewriting the Nenek Pakande Monster in the Age of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutcheon, 2006
Originality in oral traditions emerges through contextual inflection rather than unprecedented invention.
“Repetition and variation are its lifeblood; adaptability is fundamental rather than derivative (Hutcheon, 2006).Originality in oral traditions emerges through contextual inflection rather than unprecedented invention.”
From Algorithmic Storytelling and Vernacular Folklore: Rewriting the Nenek Pakande Monster in the Age of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Hutcheon, 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Saing, M. E. (2026) · Discourses on Culture · doi:10.2478/doc-2026-0010
- Authors
- Hutcheon, L.
- Corresponding author
- Hutcheon, Linda
- ORCID
- Hutcheon, Linda
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2006-06-13
- OpenAlex
- W1489148396
- Cited by
- 2,291
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 161 · 2025: 205 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 175 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 146 · 2019: 214 · 2018: 160 · 2017: 139 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 125 · 2013: 107 · 2012: 114
- FWCI
- 120.36
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Routledge eBooks (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Literature, Culture, and Aesthetics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Keywords
- creative adaptation, adaptation theory, transmedia, digital media, game narrative, film adaptation, opera adaptation, video games, amusement parks, pop music, e-books
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review