Rehabilitation
Abstract
Over the last two decades, empirical evidence has increasingly supported the view that it is possible to reduce re-offending rates by rehabilitating offenders rather than simply punishing them. In fact, the pendulum’s swing back from a pure punishment model to a rehabilitation model is arguably one of the most significant events in modern correctional policy. This comprehensive review argues that rehabilitation should focus both on promoting human goods (i.e. providing the offender with the essential ingredients for a 'good' life), as well as reducing/avoiding risk. Offering a succinct summary and critique of the scientific approach to offender rehabilitation, this intriguing volume for students of criminology, sociology and clinical psychology gives a comprehensive evaluation of both the Risk-Need Model and the Good Lives Model. Rehabilitation is a value-laden process involving a delicate balance of the needs and desires of clinicians, clients, the State and the public. Written by two international leading academics in rehabilitation research, this book argues that intervention with offenders is not simply a matter of implementing the best therapeutic technology and leaving political and social debate to politicians and policy makers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Good Lives Model of offender rehabilitation appears to fit the context of Joanna's advocacy for those in prison.
“Joanna is a strong advocate for those in prison and the Good Lives Model of offender rehabilitation appears to fit in this context (Ward 2002; Ward and Maruna 2007)”
From Faith-Based Intervention: Prison, Prayer, and Perseverance (2018) · cites this paper as Ward and Maruna 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of young offender treatment programs in Europe
Koehler, J. A., Lösel, F., Akoensi, T. D., & Humphreys, D. K. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-012-9159-7 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Mindfulness in Forensic Mental Health: Does It Have a Role?
Howells, K., Tennant, A., Day, A., & Elmer, R. (2010) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-009-0001-x · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Beyond the prison walls: Some thoughts on prisoner ‘resettlement’ in England and Wales
Moore, R. (2012) · Criminology & Criminal Justice · doi:10.1177/1748895811425445 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
A New Approach for Researching Victims: The ‘Strength-Growth-Resilience’ Framework
Green, S., Calverley, A., & O’Leary, N. (2021) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azaa093 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Faith-Based Intervention: Prison, Prayer, and Perseverance
Robinson-Edwards, S., & Kewley, S. (2018) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel9040130 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Joanna is a strong advocate for those in prison and the Good Lives Model of offender rehabilitation appears to fit in this context (Ward 2002; Ward and Maruna 2007).”
Background
- Authors
- Ward, T., & Maruna, S.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2007-05-04
- OpenAlex
- W4234997165
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 26.17
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- offender rehabilitation, recidivism, Good Lives Model, correctional policy, rehabilitation versus punishment, risk mitigation, human good, offender treatment, criminological theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review