The DOI matches its Crossref record.
IMAGINING A POST-DEVELOPMENT ERA
Abstract
For some time now, it has been difficult to talk about development, protest or revolution with the same confidence and encompassing scope with which intellectuals and activists once spoke about these vital matters. It is as if the elegant discourses of the 1960s-the high decade of both Development and Revolution — have been suspended, caught in mid-air as they strove toward their zenith, and, like fragile bubbles, exploded, leaving a scrambled trace of their glorious path behind. Hesitantly perhaps, but with a persistence that has to be taken seriously, a new discourse has set in: that of the ‘crisis of development,’ on the one hand, and of ‘new social actors’ and ‘new social movements,’ on the other. Many scholars even propose a radical reinterpretation of social and political reality based on a new set of categories such as ‘alternative development,’ new identities, radical pluralism, historicity and hegemony.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gudynas, E. (2011) · Development · doi:10.1057/dev.2011.86 · Cited by 874
Radcliffe, S. A. (2007) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00544.x · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Venue
- Power of Development
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2005-07-22
- Pages
- 221-238
- OpenAlex
- W2961323691
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 94.22
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IMAGINING A POST-DEVELOPMENT ERA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203975985-22
- The paper
- IMAGINING A POST-DEVELOPMENT ERA. (2005). Power of Development. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203975985-22
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.