Hypothetical Thinking: Dual Processes in Reasoning and Judgement
Abstract
Hypothetical thought involves the imagination of possibilities and the exploration of their consequences by a process of mental simulation. In this Classic Edition, Jonathan St B. T. Evans presents his pioneering hypothetical thinking theory; an integrated theoretical account of a wide range of psychological studies on hypothesis testing, reasoning, judgement and decision making. Hypothetical thinking theory is built on three key principles and implemented in a version of Evans' well-known heuristic–analytic theory of reasoning. The central claim of this book is that this theory can provide an integrated account of apparently diverse phenomena including confirmation bias in hypothesis testing, acceptance of fallacies in deductive reasoning, belief biases in reasoning and judgement, biases of statistical judgement and numerous characteristic findings in the study of decision making. Featuring a reflective and insightful new introduction to the book, this Classic Edition discusses contemporary theory on cognitive biases, human rationality and dual-process theories of higher cognition. It will be of great interest to researchers, post graduates as well as advanced undergraduate students.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prompts that pre-service teachers use to reflect on their teaching tend to direct their attention to observable and experiential aspects of classroom activity.
“Similarly, prompts that pre-service teachers use to reflect on their teaching tend to direct their attention to observable and experiential aspects of classroom activity (see Evans 2019;Rembe et al., 2016).”
From Conceptualising work-integrated learning to support pre-service teachers' pedagogic reasoning (2021) · cites this paper as Evans 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conceptualising work-integrated learning to support pre-service teachers' pedagogic reasoning
RusznyakI, L., & Bertram, C. (2021) · Journal of Education · doi:10.17159/2520-9868/i83a02 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Evans, J. S. B. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Plymouth (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Evans, Jonathan St B. T.
- Venue
- Psychology Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Psychology Press
- Published
- 2019-12-09
- OpenAlex
- W4254374808
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- hypothetical reasoning, hypothesis testing, mental simulation, confirmation bias, deductive reasoning, belief bias, cognitive biases, decision-making, human rationality, dual-process theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review