The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The African Union and the Institutionalisation of Pan-Africanism
Abstract
This chapter argues the African Union (AU) is the latest institutional incarnation of the idea of Pan-Africanism. However, also interrogates how the AU has only had a limited degree of success in forging a Pan-African consciousness and identity, both within the continent and among the Diaspora around the world. The chapter examines whether Pan-Africanism can serve as a conceptual framework for understanding the international relations of African countries. It enumerates the pillars integral to reviving a latent and emerging Pan-African School of Thought. The chapter assesses whether we can consider the establishment of the African Union and its predecessor the Organisation of African Unity, as sequential institutional incarnations of the spirit of Pan-Africanism. It also assesses the pitfalls of forging a Pan-African consciousness and identity. The chapter concludes by identifying pathways to enhancing and consolidating a sense of Pan-Africanism among citizens across the continent and Diaspora.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The organization enjoys little support or legitimacy among African citizens, and many view it as ineffective and as having failed to solve the continent's most pressing issues ( Tieku 2019 ; Murithi 2020 ; Witt this issue).”
From Introduction: The African Union, Pan-Africanism, and the Liberal World (Dis)Order (2023) · cites this paper as Murithi 2020
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Introduction: The African Union, Pan-Africanism, and the Liberal World (Dis)Order
Abrahamsen, R., Chimhandamba, B., & Chipato, F. (2023) · Global Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksad044 · Cited by 44
Pan-Africanism and the Affective Charges of the African Union Building in Addis Ababa
Mulugeta, D. (2021) · Journal of African Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/13696815.2021.1884971 · Cited by 23
“Currently, the AU is seen as a successor of the OAU and a carrier of the ideals of continental unity, one that promotes the ideology and practice of pan-Africanism (Mathews 2005; Murithi 2020).”
BackgroundThe Global Politics of African Identity: Pan-Africanism and the Challenge of Afropolitanism
Chipato, F. (2023) · Global Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksad046 · Cited by 23
Forging an African Union Identity: The Power of Experience
Witt, A. (2023) · Global Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksad052 · Cited by 3
Problem‐Solving by Low‐Authority International Organizations: ECOWAS ' COVID‐19 Response
Spandler, K., Söderbaum, F., & Delascio, G. A. C. (2025) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.70062 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Murithi, T.
- Corresponding author
- Murithi, Tim
- ORCID
- Murithi, Tim
- Venue
- Routledge Handbook of Pan-Africanism
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2020-04-30
- Pages
- 373-384
- OpenAlex
- W3023967167
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 13.07
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Political and Social Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African Studies and Ethnography
- Keywords
- African Union, Pan-Africanism, Organization of African Unity, African diaspora, African international relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review