The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rural women’s livelihoods and food security in Africa
Abstract
Since the early 1980s, research and policy interest in rural women’s livelihoods and food security in Africa has risen and waned in tandem with significant developments in African economies and shifts in economic policy responses to recurring crises. This chapter draws on an important body of work on rural women in agrarian and development studies that has sought to incorporate a gender perspective to rural and agrarian studies. It examines how economic liberalization has reshaped the conditions of making a living in rural Africa since the 1980s, and its implications for rural women’s livelihoods. The chapter argues that economic liberalization has intensified and created new forms of livelihood diversification strategies in rural areas that are gendered in practice and their outcomes. There are several nonagricultural activities dominated by rural women. These include harvests from common property resources, agro-processing, trading in agricultural and nonagricultural activities, and secular migration. Women’s livelihood portfolios can include several of these with or without farming.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neoliberal economic policies prioritise export-oriented growth over food sufficiency, perpetuating colonial capitalism.
“Furthermore, colonial capitalism continues to perpetuate by neoliberal economic policies that prioritise export-oriented growth over food sufficiency.”
From Rethinking resource scarcity: towards ecofeminist decolonial degrowth (2025) · cites this paper as Tsikata & Torvikey, 2021
Neoliberal policies often encourage production of export products such as cocoa, coffee, and tea while neglecting food crops, exacerbating food insecurity.
“For example, these policies often encourage the production of export products such as cocoa, coffee, and tea, whilst neglecting food crops, which exacerbates food insecurity (Tsikata & Torvikey, 2021, p. 216).”
From Rethinking resource scarcity: towards ecofeminist decolonial degrowth (2025) · cites this paper as Tsikata & Torvikey, 2021
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rethinking resource scarcity: towards ecofeminist decolonial degrowth
Park, J. (2025) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2025.2464017 · Cited by 3
“…often encourage the production of export products such as cocoa, coffee, and tea, whilst neglecting food crops, which exacerbates food insecurity (tsikata & torvikey, 2021, p. 216). similar to the honduran case discussed earlier, environmental degradation resulting from corporate and state…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsikata, D., & Torvikey, G. D.
- Venue
- The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Economics
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2021-04-24
- Pages
- 216-224
- OpenAlex
- W3155362235
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Keywords
- rural women, women's livelihoods, food security, economic liberalization, livelihood diversification, gender and rural development, common property resources, agricultural product processing, rural migration, rural Africa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review