The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Sequenced relationship-based treatment for Complex Traumatic Stress Disorders
Abstract
Complex Trauma refers to traumatic stressors that are complicated by a number of factors that differentiate them from single event or short-term exposures (Cook et al., 2005 ; Ford, 2017a ). This statement should not be taken to minimise single event trauma as it is recognised that its occurrence and impact can be at extreme levels of severity, danger, and life threat. Traumatic events may have particularly complex sequelae, however, when they involve interpersonal causation with deliberate and often premeditated acts of physical and emotional intrusion and coercion, exploitation, assault, and when violence is perpetrated on the victim by another person, group of people, or organisation. A younger age of onset of victimisation, greater difference in age between victim and perpetrator, and closer degree of relatedness between them (for example, perpetration of harm or a failure to protect from harm by parents and others known to or related to the victim, and by those from whom he or she would normally expect safety and protection) add the dimension of interpersonal betrayal and predict greater severity of traumatic impact (Becker-Blease and Freyd, 2005 ).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such a collaborative person-centered and trauma-focused assessment can enhance the often tenuous therapeutic alliance with patients presenting with BPD.
“Such a collaborative person-centered and trauma-focused assessment [22, 23] also can enhance the often tenuous therapeutic alliance with patients presenting with BPD [59, 81]”
From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [23]
PE was not initiated until on average 22 weeks of DBT had been completed, so DBT was utilized as a Phase 1 safety/stabilization intervention prior to initiating Phase 2 trauma memory processing, and half of the participants did not progress beyond Phase 1 to receive PTSD-focused treatment.
“PE was not initiated until on average 22 weeks of DBT had been completed: thus, DBT was utilized as what has been described in the cPTSD treatment field [23] as a Phase 1 safety/stabilization intervention prior to initiating Phase 2 trauma memory processing, and half of the participants did not progress beyond Phase 1 to receive PTSD-focused treatment.”
From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 1 · Cited by 2
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Metadata
- Authors
- Courtois, C. A., & Ford, J. D.
- Venue
- Humanising Mental Health Care in Australia
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-02-18
- Pages
- 211-222
- OpenAlex
- W2923251066
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- complex trauma, interpersonal trauma, betrayal trauma, interpersonal violence, perpetrator-victim relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review