Cited by 1,108Education, Philosophy, and SocietyEducational Theory and Curriculum StudiesPragmatism in Philosophy and Education

Philosophy of Education

Noddings, Nel·2018·Encyclopedia ofthe Social and Cultural Foundations of Education

Abstract

The first edition of Nel Noddings' Philosophy of Education was acclaimed as the 'best overview in the field' by the journal Teaching Philosophy and predicted to 'become the standard textbook in philosophy of education' by Educational Theory. This classic text, originally designed to give the education student a comprehensive look at philosophical thought in relation to teaching, learning, research, and educational policy, has now been updated to reflect the most current thinking in the field. A revised chapter on Logic and Critical Thinking makes the topic more accessible to students and examines how critical thinking plays a role in light of the new Common Core standards. Philosophy of Education introduces students to the evolution of educational thought, from the founding fathers to contemporary theorists, with consideration of both analytic and continental traditions. This is an essential text not only for teachers and future teachers, but also for anyone needing a survey of contemporary trends in philosophy of education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780429494864

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Investigating learners' preference should become one of the most essential steps toward humanistic education that allows for customisation and adjustment.

    “On par with Noddings (2018), Tharp (2018) and Mellati and Khademi (2014) argue that investigating learners' preference should become one of the most essential steps toward humanistic education that allows for customisation and adjustment.”

    From Representation of Culture in EFL Textbooks and Learners’ Preference (2020) · cites this paper as Noddings (2018)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noddings, N.
Corresponding author
Noddings, Nel
Venue
Encyclopedia ofthe Social and Cultural Foundations of Education
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2018-04-17
OpenAlex
W1529031170
Cited by
1,108
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 101 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 84
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Encyclopedia ofthe Social and Cultural Foundations of Education (publishedVersion)
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
Keywords
philosophy of education, history of educational thought, critical thinking, logic, Common Core State Standards, analytic tradition, continental tradition, teaching-learning process, educational research, education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review