The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction
Abstract
In principle a work of art has always been reproducible. Man-made artifacts could always be imitated by men. Replicas were made by pupils in practice of their craft, by masters for diffusing their works, and, finally, by third parties in the pursuit of gain. Mechanical reproduction of a work of art represents something new. With the woodcut graphic art became mechanically reproducible for the first time, long before script became reproducible by print. The enormous changes which printing, the mechanical reproduction of writing, has brought about in literature are a familiar story. For the first time in the process of pictorial reproduction, photography freed the hand of the most important artistic functions which henceforth devolved only upon the eye looking into a lens. The technical reproduction of sound was tackled at the end of the last century. Confronted with its manual reproduction the original preserved all its authority; not so vis a vis technical reproduction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hogan, B. (2010) · Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467610385893 · Cited by 1,318
Sarkar, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work · doi:10.1145/3596671.3597650 · Cited by 50
Makhortykh, M., Zucker, E. M., Simon, D. J., Bultmann, D., & Ulloa, R. (2023) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-023-00072-6 · Cited by 48
Tsao, J., Liang, C. X., Nogues, C., & Wong, A. (2026) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02667-2 · Cited by 25
Hertz, G. (2023) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9324.001.0001 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Benjamin, W.
- Venue
- Modern Art and Modernism: A Critical Anthology
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-05-04
- Pages
- 217-220
- OpenAlex
- W4302231525
- Cited by
- 1,275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2150.13
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780429498909-39
- The paper
- Benjamin, W. (2018). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Modern Art and Modernism: A Critical Anthology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429498909-39
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.