Cited by 71Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Declarative/Procedural Model

Ullman, Michael T.·2020·Theories in Second Language Acquisition

Abstract

The fundamental claim of the declarative/procedural model is that the declarative and procedural memory systems should play roles in language that are largely analogous to the roles they play in non-linguistic domains. Declarative memory has been intensively studied in both humans and non-human animals. Declarative and procedural memory interact with each other, with important consequences for second language acquisition. Since declarative memory is important, and perhaps necessary, for learning arbitrary pieces of information and associating them, this learning and memory system should be crucial for all learned idiosyncratic knowledge in language. Declarative memory could support grammatical knowledge in a variety of ways, including learning grammatical rules explicitly or implicitly, and storing rule-governed complex forms as chunks. Retrieval of knowledge learned in declarative memory should also depend on medial temporal lobe structures, at least soon after learning, with explicit recollection relying particularly on the hippocampus, and familiarity-based recognition involving perirhinal cortex.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780429503986-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The D/P model predicts that L2 learners initially rely on declarative memory for idiosyncratic knowledge, but some aspects of grammar can simultaneously be learned by procedural memory, and as proficiency increases procedural memory gradually takes priority.

    “For L2 learning, the D/P model specifically predicts that learners initially rely on declarative memory to acquire idiosyncratic knowledge, such as vocabulary items, morphosyntactic rules, and pragmatic functions, but some aspects of grammar (and some other features requiring probabilistic learning) can simultaneously be learned by procedural memory.”

    From Testing the three-stage model of second language skill acquisition (2025) · cites this paper as Ullman, 2020

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ashby, F. G. , Turner, B. O. , & Horvitz, J. C. (2010). Cortical and basal ganglia contributions to habit learning and automaticity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 208–215. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ullman, M. T.
Corresponding author
Ullman, Michael T.
Venue
Theories in Second Language Acquisition
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2020-02-24
Pages
128-161
OpenAlex
W4206242933
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
16.01
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
declarative memory, procedural memory, second language acquisition, grammatical knowledge, chunking, explicit and implicit learning, medial temporal lobe, hippocampus, perirhinal cortex, recollection, familiarity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review