The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pet Parents and the Loss of Attachment
Abstract
This chapter seeks to define pet parents; understand how the individuals experience the loss of a pet; and provide guidance to the clinician with a foundation for supporting grieving pet parents in practice. Far from images of trendy “pet parents” conjured by advertisements and marketing campaigns, invested pet parents are highly devoted individuals who emphasize welfare and quality of life for their pets. An ethnographic study of childfree pet owners found that terms such as “mom,” “dad,” and “the girls/boys” are frequently used to convey relationships between pets and owners in these homes. In 1984, A. Harris stated that “nonconventional human-animal bonds” put pet owners at risk for mental health concerns, particularly when euthanasia was imminent. Pets exist in a liminal space — not quite human, yet no longer “just an animal”. The presence of pets has been found to have mitigating influences on the loss felt during the bereavement of a child in the home.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In particular, many people view their pets as children [84,85,86,87] and think of themselves as ‘pet parents’.”
From Disenfranchised Guilt-Pet Owners' Burden. (2022) · cites this paper as [85]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Adkins, S. , & Rajecki, D. (1999). Pets’ roles in parents’ bereavement. Anthrozoös, 12(1), 33–42. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Disenfranchised Guilt-Pet Owners' Burden.
Kogan, L. R., Bussolari, C., Currin-McCulloch, J., Packman, W., & Erdman, P. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12131690 · Cited by 52
“, someone responsible for the physical, psychological, and financial support for those they care for [85].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Volsche, S.
- Corresponding author
- Volsche, Shelly
- ORCID
- Volsche, Shelly
- Venue
- Pet Loss, Grief, and Therapeutic Interventions
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-08-13
- Pages
- 55-69
- OpenAlex
- W2970486201
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- ScholarWorks (Boise State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Keywords
- pet loss, grief, human-animal bond, euthanasia, bereavement, pet welfare, mental health, clinician support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
